Floyd had a bad night

[MindBat]

I remember Mayweather giving him an immediate rematch and beating him decisively. Out of all the controversial decisions you've seen how many times has the winner granted an immediate rematch only to win decisively?

Exactly. Castillo and his crew wanted to prove Floyd won by a fluke.

Rather than taking a tune-up fight, requesting time to think about it, putting up barriers to avoid another tough fight, hiding behind his promoter, and asking for a catchweight, Floyd just said: "Done. When do you want it?"

[slickfox]

floyd was stepping up a division and fighting the best guy at the division right away, pac has not fought the best guy in the last 4 divisions he has won world titles at. Floyd was injured and fought a bad fight....but got a close decision. Now please go find me a bunch of pro boxers and most of the media saying they thought castillo won and that it was a robbery.

[copablack]

Good Reply!

Good post!! People don't seem to realize how long ago that was and how boxers get better with experience! They also seem to forget that Manny wasn't the fighter he is today 10 years ago and got ko'd by a scrub 3yrs before that! By the way Floyd won both those Castillo fights imo and i guess in the judges opinions too!

Yeah all of Floyd's haters bring up the first Castillo fight whenever they want to win an argument. But what you guys seem to forget was that fight was nearly ten years ago. Also Floyd came into the ring with an injury and easily won the immediate rematch. I suppose you're bringing this up because Pacquiao had an off night two weeks ago, at least thats what his supporters are saying. But I don't think Pacquiao had an off night because if that was true he had an off night every time he fought Marquez. Just face it, Marquez is a better boxer than Pac. He may not be a better athlete than Pac but he's definitely the better boxer. We can not say the same thing about Castillo.

[Left Hook Tua]

another bull**** "robbery"

every ****** fight is a robbery nowadays.

floyd is 2-0 against castillo.

[-Kev-]

Of course we remember this fight...it's reminded here every year with 15-20 threads a year. It was more than 10 years ago...yet when Pacquiao-Singsurat is brought up, which happened around the same time give or take a year..."That was a long time ago who cares?".

[Left Hook Tua]

Of course we remember this fight...it's reminded here every year with 15-20 threads a year. It was more than 10 years ago...yet when Pacquiao-Singsurat is brought up, which happened around the same time give or take a year..."That was a long time ago who cares?".

shut up , crybaby.

[Fay]

was he "money" mayweather yet??? thats probably why they dont remember

[Left Hook Tua]

was he "money" mayweather yet??? thats probably why they dont remember

i think he was still pretty boy.

pretty boy >>>>> money

pretty boy wasn't a ***** like money is.

[daggum]

I remember Mayweather giving him an immediate rematch and beating him decisively. Out of all the controversial decisions you've seen how many times has the winner granted an immediate rematch only to win decisively?

well it was either rematch castillo or fight slick southpaw stevie johnston so it's not like he had any easy options. i guess he could have faked a retirement but he hadn't thought of that tactic back then.

[BUTE]

So true, i mean honestly, why go back 10 years for a 'robbery'. I only have to go back 2 weeks to find an even bigger robbery.


Typical ******* post...he lost to marquez, *******s get over it please.........geeez