Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiao is the Victim Of the Most Ridiculous Slander in History

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by BoxingGenius27
    Can't prove someones guilty without a trial.

    Can't prove a fighter is clean without a test.
    That's what I was going to bait somebody into........THANKS

    Comment


    • Originally posted by CHOWWOKKA View Post
      That's what I was going to bait somebody into........THANKS
      Darn it!

      Hang on, I'm going to delete my post and you delete yours. Someone will fall for it lol

      Comment


      • Originally posted by BoxingGenius27
        Can't prove someones guilty without a trial.

        Can't prove a fighter is clean without a test.

        Does that mean before the Mosley fight you can't prove that Mayweather was clean?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
          Does that mean before the Mosley fight you can't prove that Mayweather was clean?
          If you want to look at it that way, sure.

          More reason to implement better testing, right? Yay, you did it D4th! You're learning now.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by CHOWWOKKA View Post
            Do you guys believe in innocent until proven guilty?
            No, not when it comrs to PED use in pro sports. If there must be evidence for people to be su****ious of a pro athlete using PEDs, then there wouldn't be any drug testing of any kind in the 1st place. Why should an athlete even submit to a urine test if there hasn't been any proof that he/she has ever used PEDs?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
              Does that mean before the Mosley fight you can't prove that Mayweather was clean?
              Yea pretty much......

              If somebody skips trial for a murder, will the public see him ad the killer? Of course they would, now who is at fault? The alleged killer man guy. So if all the newspapers headline "Guy skips trial, Possible killer?". It is his own fault.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by CHOWWOKKA View Post
                Yea pretty much......

                If somebody skips trial for a murder, will the public see him ad the killer? Of course they would, now who is at fault? The alleged killer man guy. So if all the newspapers headline "Guy skips trial, Possible killer?". It is his own fault.
                You need evidecne before you go to trial.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
                  You need evidecne before you go to trial.
                  And what kind of evidence would you be satisfied with? Because I know his punching power and speed and yatta yatta isn't enough. So what would you say be the right kind of evidence for a drug test?

                  Comment


                  • He may not be associated with Heredia or Conte but his trainer did have a fighter that tested positive and he openly admitted that he(Roach) thought they would have been out of his system by fight night.

                    Comment


                    • And Marquez gets NO HEAT considering his nutritionist was former Balco associate Angel Hernandez... Marquez stood his ground against Pacman and took his punches well this time around.. WHY DOESNT THIS RAISE THE QUESTION MARQUEZ WAS ON SOME TYPE OF UNDETECTABLE PED...

                      MARQUEZ = HERNANDEZ
                      PACMAN = NO EVIDENCE OR NEVER ASSOCIATED WITH PED EXPERTS..

                      "SMH"

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP