QUESTION: If Manny only fights Floyd and gets stopped, then fights JMM and loses.....

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • shogun1123
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Jul 2009
    • 225
    • 25
    • 0
    • 6,290

    #21
    Originally posted by -Kev-
    I like how people are mentioning top 10 ATG's losing against each other, to try to defend why it would be okay for Pacquiao to get owned by the M&M boys.


    If Pacquiao loses to Mayweather and then Marquez, it would just show how people were right that he just had great matchmaking and only fought guys who were there "to fight" and "come forward". And as soon as he was faced with a true challenge of a style, he looked average. People will then see that he really did duck Raheem, Guzman, Casamayor in 2006-2008.

    PERFECT.

    Not only that when you add in the Only fighting fighters coming of losses and catch-weights. It all adds up to great match-making on a epic scale.

    Comment

    • QADASHBANYAH
      Banned
      • Mar 2010
      • 1075
      • 69
      • 73
      • 1,211

      #22
      Originally posted by Zocalo
      No, it means he fought the best unlike some other fighters of his era. Ali lost his fair share of fight, but no one gives a **** because he fought all comers.
      Yep but no one was saying that ali's last challenge was x3 years ago either, and thats exactly what people were saying regarding pac..... Max Kellerman even made that statement....

      ALI DIDNT ASK FOR CATCHWEIGHTS OR FIGHT FOR TITLES WITH STIPULATIONS EITHER.

      So yes his legacy would take a hit, he ****in lost, and what makes it worse is hes saying mayweather is afraid, and he will lose.... Put it this way, I would bet the house that Floyd would whoop his ass convincingly.... Floyd would go postal on Pacs ass. He really wants to hurt pac...

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP