How the hell you called this a robbery!

[mccready]

Fight was close. DEFINITELY NOT A robbery. Heres a good example of how Mexicans judge a fight, look at the scoring for the Angulo-Kirkland before Angulo was dropped. Awful. You cant score a fight like that, if a round is close, you automatically give it to your fighter? Hell no...

Didn't Lederman and at least one of the official judges give every 'close' round to Pacman? That's the only way you can explain 8-4 for Pacquiao.

[Steven Adams]

Who do you think won in round 2? A lot of people been saying Marquez won the round 2 but no matter how many times I watched this video. I only saw Marquez 2 or 3 punches landed clearly on Pacquiao.

i like watching pro fights being scored in an amateur environment

[Brockton Lip]

People crying robbery about this fight need to get a clue. And them saying this is whats hurting boxing because then the casual fans or people that dont like boxing talk about fixed fights when this was a very close fight that could do either way.
People are just mad because they either have an agenda against Pac or since Marquez was a big underdog and did better than most people thought he would.

[Porter's Dad]

On the whole, the fight was a disaster for Pac and triumph for JMM - but on a round by round basis, it is extremely close. I had it 6-6. I had Pac shading it on first viewing but fully expected to score it for JMM on a re-watch due to the outcry - but I just don't see this robbery.

[tatangb45]

Fights don't happen in slow motion they happen in real time! So cut it out with the slow mo stuff because it's getting tiresome. All I'll say is this, Pacquiao landed more punches to the head while Marquez landed more punches to the body. People are are getting hung up on all the headshots Pacquiao landed but not giving Marquez credit for his exceptional body work. There were times in the fight were Pacquiao would land on Marquez's face and Marquez would land one or two body shots in return.

After watching the fight again I'd say it was a a draw/slight win for Marquez but not quite a robbery. 8 rounds to 4 for Pacquiao is just ludicrous.

In many sports, even in the Olympics, the instant replay in slow motion are used to determine the accuracy of a referee's call. In swimming, it shows who touched the wall first. In track and field, in horse racing and in other competitions where you can have a photo finish, slow motion and stop motion determines more accurately who is the actual winner.
Next time, use your common sense before posting.

[littlemac]

LOL same old story.

LOL at ------>"I beat Jmm clearly, now I want a rematch" lol.....

[Marchegiano]

Yeah, y'all are ****ed.

[Fetta]

Even HBO facebook poll had a majority for JMM winning last night. Hell only 12% of the media had Pac winning but whats done is done and this gift decision, yes it was a gift decision, was given to fight Mayweather. He said lets go without Arum there then with Arum there he says up to my promoter. Anything less and i lose more respect for boxing.

[boxer.exposed]

If you watch patiently these videos, do you think it was a robbery? I scored the fight according to what these videos showed to us. Watch the detailed captions of every punches landed on both fighters.

round 1 - close but goes to Pacquiao who threw more punches and the aggressor
round 2 - Pacquiao, landed more punches
round 3 - Pacquiao, landed more punces
round 4 - close but goes to Pacquiao who threw more punces and the aggresor
round 5 - Marquez, landed more punches
round 6 - Pacquiao, landed more punches

Round 1



Round 2



Round 3



Round 4



Round 5

[boxer.exposed]

Round 6 is up. Another ass whopping from Pacquiao.

Round 6

At first, I thought this round was close and I gave to Marquez. Now I give it to Pacquaio.