Comments Thread For: Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. Stops Peter Manfredo in The Fifth

[PACnPBFsuck]

What happened?

Pacquiao was moving the way he does with his good footwork and then got caught with a huge uppercut.

So Jim is praising PAC's footwork and get's caught then Kellerman comes in and says something like all that great footwork and get's caught by an uppercut, he basically played him.

[PACnPBFsuck]

Marquez dominated round 10.

HBO commentators can suck it.

I'm trying to understand how harold had PAC winning, the 8th and 10th rounds,those weren't even close.

[UglyPug]

I'm trying to understand how harold had PAC winning, the 8th and 10th rounds,those weren't even close.

lol round 10 was close. . .

[Evil Abed]

lol round 10 was close. . .

No it wasn't.

Pac did very little and Marquez landed effective combinations.

Jim Lampley not reacting to it doesn't mean it didn't happen.

[J-Smooth]

max kellerman telling it like it is

[PACnPBFsuck]

lol round 10 was close. . .

Pac threw %50 more punches and landed less than Marquez, at some point the punches have to land. It's not effective aggresiveness if you're not being effective.

[theplayerpimp]

Some because lets be honest Manfredo is just a borderline journeyman/contender fighter.

but you and a lot of people are saying he will ko jr

[Bombs]

Alright let's go Petey!!! Get me that dough douuugh!

[Devdem]

Jimmy Lennon Jr on MY HBO?

Is this real life?

[UglyPug]

No it wasn't.

Pac did very little and Marquez landed effective combinations.

Jim Lampley not reacting to it doesn't mean it didn't happen.

i saw pacquiao land straight lefts and check right hooks. . .

i saw it differently, and i believe i can support and defend my stance just like you do yours. . . lol but either was it was NOT "dominated" by marquez. . .

this fight was dead even and close as can be. . .