lets rescore jmm-manny 3

[TP6 U Snitch]

"For all those dumb mutha****as who can't score a fight objectively without Lampleys *****ass ****riding commentary, here is the fact...

116-112 on Lederman and the other official's scorecard IS a robbery. No way did Manny Pacquiao win 8 of the 12 rounds in that fight."

The Truck

[Check_hooks]

Looking at the punchzone stats you can clearly tell why Marquez ran to the back so that his fans wouldn't see him turn into the elephant man

[crold1]

fixed........

And yet I had Marquez winning the first two.

[RajahBell]

7-5 Pacquiao

I gave 9, 11, and 12 to Pacquiao. However, these were all close rounds.

[randysav]

can someone post the after fight photo of pac and marquez fight

[rambov]

1 pac
2 jmm
3 pac
4 pac
5 jmm
6 pac
7 jmm
8 jmm
9 jmm
10 jmm
11 jmm
12 jmm

same score i had before, but i originally had scored 4 for jmm and 11 for pacquio

Gauze, he didn't win 12.

[WombBat]

just look at the compubox numbers and Marquez's face and its obvious that Pac did the most damage and beat the **** outta him

stop with compubox, refer to sig

[Fetta]

8-4 JMM easy. Sitting with some else who this is first time seeing it and they scored it 9-3 for JMM. Clear win

[Wapacman]

Says the guy who lost his account **** riding floyd like a lil b*tch lmao

But back to the fight I had almost the same scorecard as Lederman except I gave the 2 and 11 to Pac which means I had it 10-2.

10-2 is BS! You are a f@ggot and cant score a fight!

[Easy-E]

I think the reason people are calling this a robbery is because Marquez probably should have been given the nod in the first fight (he won at least 8 rounds) and the second fight he had a clear edge and they gave it to Pac.

It was more of the same...Marquez landed clean shots and counterpunched effectively, but judges nowadays suck. They don't give any credit to boxers, to counterpunchers, its all about volume. its a real problem with the sport.