I dont get it..manny goes life and death with jmm and its ok cause jmm is a great fighter.but floyd dominates jmm 2 years earlier and it shouldnt count???why the double standards??jmm beat mannys ass 3 times and its coll cause hes a great fighter but floyd toys with jmm and dominates him and it isnt a legit win????????the double standards for manny are hilarious
Manny struggles with marquez=hes a great fighter.floyd beats jmm=he beat a llw
Collapse
-
-
One shouldn't discredit a win just because stylistically one is outmatched. I still gave Pacquiao credit for beating Clottey.Comment
-
Just because JMM and PBF are both counter punchers DOESN'T mean they fight the same against Pac. JMM has great success because of his great technical ability, but more so no one talks about....HES NOT AFRAID to mix it up and he takes WAY MORE risks than Floyd EVER HAS. As for the size.....i dont discredit the win for Floyd, but lets be honest....physically...its night and day between the new Marquez and the one that Floyd fought.I dont get it..manny goes life and death with jmm and its ok cause jmm is a great fighter.but floyd dominates jmm 2 years earlier and it shouldnt count???why the double standards??jmm beat mannys ass 3 times and its coll cause hes a great fighter but floyd toys with jmm and dominates him and it isnt a legit win????????the double standards for manny are hilariousComment
-
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
It's double standards to an extent.
People will point to the fact that Marquez when he fought Floyd wasn't in as great shape that he was in for when he fought Pac & that Floyd weighed in a lot bigger than he should have. But that doesn't take away from the fact that Marquez was totally schooled by Floyd.Comment
Comment