Tweet
Why was it ok for Manny Pacquiao to fight Marquez at 38 but when Floyd dominated him he was too 'old' ?
Also why did people call Marquez too small when him and Manny are the same size and Marquez was actually bigger on the night? But it wasnt ok for Floyd to fight Marquez but he was ducking Pacquiao (supposedly)?
Finally why did Pacquiao fight Mosley a year after Mayweather dominated him, and Arum called him 'old' but when Manny beat him there wasnt a real backlash?
Its because Floyd Mayweather is in a no win sitatuation.
There either over the hill (Mosley, De la Hoya) Inexperienced (Ortiz) Too smakk (Hatton, Marquez) Weight drained (Coralles) or simply cherry picked (Baldomir)
But pre fight the opponent is praised as possibly the guy that will finally defeat Floyd!
Example: Floyd is ducking Margarito. Margarito is proved as a cheat, gets DESTROYED by Mosley but when Floyd dominates Shane then we hear no chant of Margarito?
Furthemore why do people always seek to bring up the argument that Pacquiao done a quicker job with common opponents. Well guess what? Hatton done a quicker job on Castillo, but what happened with Floyd and Ricky? There you go!
We do know that Pacquiao been knocked out twice.
We do know that he got outboxed by Eric Morales.
We also know that Mayweather beat Oscar with heavyweight 10 ounce gloves and also kncoked Hatton out with 10 ounce gloves.
People love controversy, they never talk about Floyds charity efforts; but they lvoe to talk about his flashy lifestyle (which he can afford btw.) But nobody talks about how Manny is getting ripped off by Bob Arum, has ******** problems and also had to ask for an advance because of these money problems.
Floyd is always in a NO WIN SITUATION.
Also why did people call Marquez too small when him and Manny are the same size and Marquez was actually bigger on the night? But it wasnt ok for Floyd to fight Marquez but he was ducking Pacquiao (supposedly)?
Finally why did Pacquiao fight Mosley a year after Mayweather dominated him, and Arum called him 'old' but when Manny beat him there wasnt a real backlash?
Its because Floyd Mayweather is in a no win sitatuation.
There either over the hill (Mosley, De la Hoya) Inexperienced (Ortiz) Too smakk (Hatton, Marquez) Weight drained (Coralles) or simply cherry picked (Baldomir)
But pre fight the opponent is praised as possibly the guy that will finally defeat Floyd!
Example: Floyd is ducking Margarito. Margarito is proved as a cheat, gets DESTROYED by Mosley but when Floyd dominates Shane then we hear no chant of Margarito?
Furthemore why do people always seek to bring up the argument that Pacquiao done a quicker job with common opponents. Well guess what? Hatton done a quicker job on Castillo, but what happened with Floyd and Ricky? There you go!
We do know that Pacquiao been knocked out twice.
We do know that he got outboxed by Eric Morales.
We also know that Mayweather beat Oscar with heavyweight 10 ounce gloves and also kncoked Hatton out with 10 ounce gloves.
People love controversy, they never talk about Floyds charity efforts; but they lvoe to talk about his flashy lifestyle (which he can afford btw.) But nobody talks about how Manny is getting ripped off by Bob Arum, has ******** problems and also had to ask for an advance because of these money problems.
Floyd is always in a NO WIN SITUATION.
Comment