Comments Thread For: Marquez's Trainer Taunts Pacquiao, Demands $25 Million

[-Kev-]

Marquez would have won a majority decision, but he forgot to fight the last two rounds. You think he would have learned his lesson the first two times...I guess not.

Let's say Marquez did fight the last two rounds, which I think it's bullshit, even Ledermen's corrupted scorecard had Marquez winning the last round. Glenn Trowbridge would have had it 114-114, a Draw.

There's no way Marquez would have won on Glenn's scorecard, no way. The 116-112 scorecard shows this to me. One judge already had Pacquiao winning before the fight even started. So Marquez really just had a chance to impress two, less corrupted but questionable, judges. Cause the third one already had him beat.

Doesn't that smell like a paid judge?

[Blubba]

Let's say Marquez did fight the last two rounds, which I think it's bullshit, even Ledermen's corrupted scorecard had Marquez winning the last round. Glenn Trowbridge would have had it 114-114, a Draw.

There's no way Marquez would have won on Glenn's scorecard, no way. The 116-112 scorecard shows this to me. One judge already had Pacquiao winning before the fight even started. So Marquez really just had a chance to impress two, less corrupted but questionable, judges. Cause the third one already had him beat.

Doesn't that smell like a paid judge?

cool story brother lol

[CLARET]

Man, I have never heard so much crying from a grown man. Well, FLoyd is a very close example but come on now. Marquez lost! He is in no position whatsoever to demand anything. Yeah he lost a close fight. Lots of people saw it but he did not exactly fought like he wanted to win. It looked more like he was just there protecting himself by countering all night.

[CLARET]

Personally, I scored the fight 115-113.

[spoonwars]

Let's say Marquez did fight the last two rounds, which I think it's bullshit, even Ledermen's corrupted scorecard had Marquez winning the last round. Glenn Trowbridge would have had it 114-114, a Draw.

There's no way Marquez would have won on Glenn's scorecard, no way. The 116-112 scorecard shows this to me. One judge already had Pacquiao winning before the fight even started. So Marquez really just had a chance to impress two, less corrupted but questionable, judges. Cause the third one already had him beat.

Doesn't that smell like a paid judge?

Pacquiao still won even without the judges' scores. Pacquiao still won with Marquez cramping his feet. Pacquiao still won with Marquez drinking pee-flavored electrolytes. Pacquiao still won with Jinkee not giving him any sex. Pacquiao still won with Ariza being a snob.

If Marquez was serious in proving a point, he wouldn't try dictating this much. If Marquez was serious in proving a point, he would've made another t-shirt in advance (which Pacquiao did this time to get back at Marquez). Next should be Mayweather, as long he doesn't secure another fight before negotiations.

[disolly]

Marquez would have won a majority decision, but he forgot to fight the last two rounds. You think he would have learned his lesson the first two times...I guess not.

agreed, i still had him winning slightly. but he could have done more and leading up to the fight he spoke as if he knew that, so i don't agree with the judges but at the same time i think he could have done more, especially since he was the challenger.

[larry331]

b4 jmm can be given that huge amount...he should face cotto..mosley..margaritto..dela joya and clotey..perhaps K.O. some of them....
Pacman earned that mega privillege of recieving that huge amount not by just beating one boxing superstar but rather almost all of them were one sided fight for the Pacman...
Marquez was not even close in knocking out pacman...
he should have stalk pacman from round 1 to 12 ...but instead he ran and ran and throw few counter punches...
And that a win for team jmm...

[tibbar]

the only thing that was proven in the fight is manny is also human after all, who can have an off night which even so, can only make a majority decision at the least. its a bad day at the office that is all. so move along.

[BoZz]

the only thing that was proven in the fight is manny is also human after all, who can have an off night which even so, can only make a majority decision at the least. its a bad day at the office that is all. so move along.

took you *******s 10 years to realize that

I guess the vision was blurred because his nutt sack was in front of your eyes shhsahsasaahhahahhahahaaaa

pac is a human who can't box for ****

END THREAD/

[Klemman]

It was a close fight but if you choose a defensive counter punching strategy, you need to have a more decisive victory. While JMM may have had more of the best punches of the fight, it wasn't such a difference versus MP's best punches that you could say he dominated the fight.

While he frustrated MPP a bit, JMM never forced MP to change his strategy.
MP was never hurt, was never at risk of going down, landed more punches overall, was the aggressor, and while MPP had a cut inside his mouth in the later rounds and a cut due to a head butt, it was JMM who's faced was the most marked up by the end of the fight.

Not to mention MPP was the reigning champion at that weight. Forget the names of the fighters and history of the previous matches, did the challanger do enough to de-throne the reigning champion?

It was a close fight, but how can you justify JMM winning?