What does ESPN changing it's P4P ranking from #1Pac to #1Floyd tell you?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chups
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2004
    • 18400
    • 1,835
    • 1,281
    • 52,879

    #11
    Originally posted by Reloaded
    Funny how only Pac fanboys know anything about the sport , you titanic is sinking find another hero to beat Floyd because this one is going to the bottom .
    LOL@ titanic is sinking......LOL. What proved to me last Saturday is that *****s/Floyd got owned accusing Pac of steroids when he is clearly has none. And that most fans will only expect him to demolish an opponent, anything less or a close fight is a loss in their eyes.

    In 3 fights, this is the first time I was sure Pac won, you can twist it what you want, I'm glad he won. ESPN (and Yahoo) can change their list whatever they want, it just means they are not credible. How can a fighter be demoted when he did not lose? Even the RING did not change their P4P rankings when they had Floyd as 1 fighting Buseless, Corleys and Mitchells while Pacquiao was demolishing Barreras, Marquezes, Larioses and Moraleses. They can't because Floyd did not lose, they waited for Floyd to retire before they put Pacquiao in 1.

    Comment

    • brick wall
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Feb 2008
      • 6480
      • 259
      • 35
      • 24,574

      #12
      Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI-
      it just means that the floyd f@gs go from 'ESPN dont know **** about boxing' to 'ESPN is the truth'

      don't be surprised if they gonna start ****riding skip bayless soon...they used to hate him with passion.

      Comment

      • Chups
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • May 2004
        • 18400
        • 1,835
        • 1,281
        • 52,879

        #13
        Originally posted by Light_Speed
        The same ring magazine that showed that the majority of sports writers scored the fight for Marquez?

        http://*******.com/835687r
        That's fine. But the Magazine always abide by the judges decision. Remember when Bernard trashed the RING because although the magazine thinks he won against Taylor, they still have to abide the decision and gave the (belt?) and rankings to Jermain.

        Comment

        • SyrianPoster
          Banned
          • Nov 2011
          • 167
          • 19
          • 10
          • 306

          #14
          *******s lost , get over it , NOBODY believes in the Pacquiao hype anymore , apparently *******s are the real cry-babies

          Comment

          • Slip Stream
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2010
            • 3104
            • 259
            • 357
            • 16,595

            #15
            Originally posted by SyrianPoster
            *******s lost , get over it , NOBODY believes in the Pacquiao hype anymore , apparently *******s are the real cry-babies
            What I love about last Saturday are the steady and uninterrupted stream of excuses from the Pacoholics. The myth has been busted and the last people to understand this naturally are those for whom Pacquiao was an unbeatable Titan, even though he's had his eyes knocked crooked on two occasions.

            the next excuse we'll hear is that *****'s responsible for Pac's pathetic performance.

            Comment

            • WARQUEZ
              World Class™
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Sep 2011
              • 4275
              • 296
              • 213
              • 12,259

              #16
              ESPN don't know shit about boxing.

              Marquez should be number 1.

              Comment

              • Chups
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • May 2004
                • 18400
                • 1,835
                • 1,281
                • 52,879

                #17
                LOL@ the crybabies (Marquez fans) and the d1cksuckers (*****s).


                I'll be SAD when Pac loses ok? But not now....maybe next time.....LOL!! Still Champ b1tches.

                Comment

                • OfficialUBFNews
                  Up and Comer
                  Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                  • Nov 2011
                  • 59
                  • 8
                  • 10
                  • 6,099

                  #18
                  Originally posted by BoxingFollower
                  http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id...boxers-nos-1-3

                  So everyone knows that ESPN HATES Floyd Mayweather Jr...well atlest some of there host, and he has been called cowardly by many of them.

                  But why do you see that Pacquiao was REMOVED from #1 P4P and Floyd was put there? without even a fight.

                  Do you think they can see how easy of a fight it would be for Floyd Mayweather, or how Pacquiao struggled or even got beat by Marquez?
                  I think it's a move based completely on conjecture. Mayweather's last fights were against a shot Mosley whom Pacquiao beat even more impressively, and a 4 round fight with Ortiz that ended controversially. It's impossible to know how the fight would have completed down the stretch.

                  I can understand the logic, but it's a huge decision. And in my opinion a rash and foolish one.

                  Comment

                  • SyrianPoster
                    Banned
                    • Nov 2011
                    • 167
                    • 19
                    • 10
                    • 306

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Chups
                    LOL@ the crybabies (Marquez fans) and the d1cksuckers (*****s).


                    I'll be SAD when Pac loses
                    ok? But not now....maybe next time.....LOL!! Still Champ b1tches.


                    Pacquiao already lost for the public , ONLY *******S ARE PROUD OF THIS ROBBERY , Pacquiao is nothing but a paper champion .

                    Comment

                    • WARQUEZ
                      World Class™
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Sep 2011
                      • 4275
                      • 296
                      • 213
                      • 12,259

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Chups
                      LOL@ the crybabies (Marquez fans) and the d1cksuckers (*****s).


                      I'll be SAD when Pac loses ok? But not now....maybe next time.....LOL!! Still Champ b1tches.
                      Stop lying to yourself Chups. Accept your defeat like a man, sure Manny isn't doing it but that doesn't mean you always have to follow your leader. Set an example.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP