No offense, and not to flame but lack of skill set alone shouldn’t be a deterrent to what dictates what should be the metric/set criteria for P4P number 1 status.
Here’s an example, Felix Trinidad wasn’t as talented skill wise as Bernard Hopkins does that mean before he faced Hopkins he wasn’t worthy of his P4P # 1 status before his defeat to Bernard?
Also did anyone notice Manny Pacquiaos frustration in the post fight interview vs Marquez?
The only two big flaws manny has is that he has problems cutting the ring off and his reflexes don't match his insane speed. Other than that hes a short Ivan Drago.
Also did anyone notice Manny Pacquiaos frustration in the post fight interview vs Marquez?
Whoever made that video is EXTREMELY well versed in boxing technique and strategy. Any TRUE BOXING FAN knows that Pacquiao is wild, unskilled, and has a very limited tool set.
All he does is go straight forward and if he's in trouble he goes straight back. And he'll probably be flailing his arms around like he's punching or something.
Yeah and someone's gonna say, "if Pacquiao's so bad at boxing then how come he's been winning so much."
DUDE OPEN YOUR EYES AND LOOK AT HIS RECORD. POST RICKY HATTON.
He's been cherry picking for soooo long.
Originally posted by FloydPacquiaoJr
Dude wake up, a ******* made this to make him sleep better at night. Go and hit the books, actually learn something about boxing technique why don't you.
To me, the best p4p fighter is based solely on accomplishments. I dont think Roy Jones was the most skilled fighter in the world in his prime, but he was still the best.
Now, you can make a fair argument for either Mayweather or Pacquiao with my above criteria. Mayweather has the dominance and consistancy over time, whilst imo Pacquiao has the better wins, ie his best win(first Barrera fight) is better than any singular win Mayweather has, and his win over Cotto is better than any win Mayweather has at 147lbs.
I actually am not sure who I would put as p4p #1 right now.
Comment