Manny sure of win after watching tape

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mccready
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 127
    • 5
    • 5
    • 6,372

    #41
    Originally posted by -D33Pwaters-
    Marquez shots were cleaner, but Pacquiao was still more accurate. Marquez lost.
    Haha. That doesn't even make sense.

    If you need to resort to twisted logic to justify your position, more power to you.

    Comment

    • Vadrigar.
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2010
      • 8134
      • 517
      • 415
      • 20,350

      #42
      Originally posted by mccready
      Haha. That doesn't even make sense.

      If you need to resort to twisted logic to justify your position, more power to you.
      Pacquiao's connect percentage was higher in the fight so he was more accurate.

      Comment

      • puga
        rigo-go power rangers
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Sep 2010
        • 13980
        • 584
        • 568
        • 22,139

        #43
        Originally posted by Marijn
        Its getting funny how people are trying to convince that Pacquiao won. I've seen the fight 4 times now (HBO and UK commentary) and i still think Marquez outboxed Pacquiao pretty decisively.
        no one is trying to covince anyone here...just stating opinions....you got it for jmm, does not mean you are right...i got it for pac, does not mean im right either.....pac won tho, whether you like it or not..

        Comment

        • Vadrigar.
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2010
          • 8134
          • 517
          • 415
          • 20,350

          #44
          Originally posted by puga
          no one is trying to covince anyone here...just stating opinions....you got it for jmm, does not mean you are right...i got it for pac, does not mean im right either.....pac won tho, whether you like it or not..
          Finally someone who agrees. Thought I was the only one.

          Comment

          • mccready
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Dec 2008
            • 127
            • 5
            • 5
            • 6,372

            #45
            Originally posted by -D33Pwaters-
            Pacquiao's connect percentage was higher in the fight so he was more accurate.
            That's not a measure of accuracy, it's a measure of efficiency. It says whether a punch landed or not, but it doesn't say anything at all about how well the punch landed.

            Comment

            • Vadrigar.
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2010
              • 8134
              • 517
              • 415
              • 20,350

              #46
              Originally posted by mccready
              That's not a measure of accuracy, it's a measure of efficiency. It says whether a punch landed or not, but it doesn't say anything at all about how well the punch landed.
              It is a measure of accuracy. I agree that Marquez's shots stood out more but he was not more accurate.

              Comment

              • americanbot
                Banned
                • Aug 2010
                • 4002
                • 179
                • 29
                • 4,267

                #47
                Originally posted by puga
                your're right i've never been to a big boxing event , i ilve where there is no big boxing event .show me a proof where those fans crying robbery had scorecards in their hnds during the fight ..it's way too impractical /unbelievable for a fan to watch it live at the arena and have scorecard ready esp when most of them are far from the ring.....it's you that needs to face it , pac won!
                at this point i feel sorry for you............

                Comment

                • puga
                  rigo-go power rangers
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Sep 2010
                  • 13980
                  • 584
                  • 568
                  • 22,139

                  #48
                  Originally posted by americanbot
                  at this point i feel sorry for you............
                  dont be ,...for all i know you could be making **** up...i've never once seen a fan after a big fight wave a scorecard....i just think , your full of ****...

                  Comment

                  • mccready
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 127
                    • 5
                    • 5
                    • 6,372

                    #49
                    Originally posted by -D33Pwaters-
                    It is a measure of accuracy. I agree that Marquez's shots stood out more but he was not more accurate.
                    Do you agree there are varying degrees of accuracy? That some landed punches are more accurate than other landed punches? If you do, then that means accuracy is about the quality of punches landed, NOT quantity of punches landed.

                    Percentage of connected punches counts the punches that landed and divides by punches thrown. Therefore, it is a ratio of quan****** and, by definition, can NOT say anything about the quality of punching.

                    Comment

                    • fceeviper
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jun 2011
                      • 2023
                      • 53
                      • 6
                      • 8,422

                      #50
                      So Pac if you clearly beat JMM, why is it you and Team Arum want a rematch?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP