Watched the FIGHT in slowMo (impressed w/ pac's right hook)

[daggum]

Did anyone see the beating Jeff Lacy put on Calzaghe?

Man, I just re-watched that fight in slow motion and Left Hook Lacy was robbed. NSAC can expect to hear from my lawyer 3 months from now. I won't go quietly on this one.

WAR slow mo

lacy ruined calzaghe. where is calzaghe now............exactly. ruined.

[UmissUpay]

Great, a video of Pacquiao's highlights in which, they're not even highlights at all. A volley of ineffective punches that don't even amount to anything because JMM was landing with harder blows. You know, the ones that win rounds. Unless you think Pac stole rounds with reluctant volume.

Pacquiao's head was snappin back from right hands all night and getting wobbled. Oh I saw the speed of Pacquiao in that fight, so I agree his shots might as well have looked invisible...lol. Maybe Emanuel Steward should teach him some balance and how to really throw the right because all Freddy cares about is Pac's punch output, and not versatility.

a 4 to 6 hard shot for 12rounds
vs this?


a punch thrown to a moving towards u opponents looks more effective againts a punch thrown to a moving away from u opponent dawg

but they are both effective ask jmm
and look at his swelling face after the fight

what impressed me more is pac was able to land blinding shots againts a defensive fight who backpedalled for 12 rounds trying to play safe

marquez as a counter puncher needs to do more that just land a hard shot
thats like saying mosley should have won because he had the best hard punch highlight vs floyds pitty patty dominance for 12 rounds

[BoxingGenius27]

lacy ruined calzaghe. where is calzaghe now............exactly. ruined.

Yep. Calzaghe never recovered from that fight. He was never the same after.

The evidence is all there. Just watch it in slow motion. You'll see.

[Da Hammer]

You don't even need slow motion to see Pacquiao won 115-113 although slow mo just confirms it. Pac was the aggressor, landed more shots, and hurt Marquez more than JMM hurt Pac. JMM might have landed some real good crisp shots but it doesn't negate what Pac did in return.

[BoxingGenius27]

You don't even need slow motion to see Pacquiao won 115-113 although slow mo just confirms it. Pac was the aggressor, landed more shots, and hurt Marquez more than JMM hurt Pac. JMM might have landed some real good crisp shots but it doesn't negate what Pac did in return.

Hurt JMM?

Pac is on record saying JMM hurt him. Unless I'm missing something, JMM never said he was hurt. There was nowhere in the fight where JMM implied he was hurt. I don't understand?

For all the slow mo experts that watched the fight 8 times, what round/time was Pac hurt?

I bet you guys say he was never hurt, not realizing he already admitted to being hurt. But since you guys are the slow mo professionals, show me where he was hurt?

[rapidtracer.com]

In all honesty, I've been in the trenches with you guys before. I've tried talking logically with you guys, especially you Tatangb45. You don't remember the day I debated with you for 12 hours and it took you 10 hours to understand 1 small concept?

In fact, you admitted to understanding what I was saying 10 hours after the fact, only to turn around and act like you didn't understand and start trolling again at the 12 hour mark.

So you see, I had to learn the hard way with you guys. But the catch is, "I learned". I learned to never seriously debate you pacamaniacs. No matter how much concrete evidence you show, pacamaniacs are professionals at turning a blind cheek and playing ******. You guys have mastered the art of playing ****** when you are clearly proven wrong.

So when I hear things like "slow motion", I automatically know where this is leading. We can re-watch the fight in slow motion, super slow motion, fast forward, rewind, drunk, high, or sober and at the end of the day, it won't change a thing on your point of view.

So until then, you guys can kiss my ass in slow motion hahahahaha

You are missing the point BoxingGenius27 wannabe. The point is that you Marquez's fanatic thinks that Marquez outbox Pacquiao and Pacquiao was not landing ****. But in reality Pacquiao was outlanding marquez and hitting those shot you so called "didnt land ****."

But I bet after you read this you are still gonna act like the best troll and blame on your past arguement with someone.

Slowmo is important for looking at things that you missed like getting head butt.. Was it intentional? Was it an accident?

You get my point now or are you still a troll???

[UmissUpay]

Hurt JMM?

Pac is on record saying JMM hurt him. Unless I'm missing something, JMM never said he was hurt. There was nowhere in the fight where JMM implied he was hurt. I don't understand?

For all the slow mo experts that watched the fight 8 times, what round/time was Pac hurt?

I bet you guys say he was never hurt, not realizing he already admitted to being hurt. But since you guys are the slow mo professionals, show me where he was hurt?

why would he admit he was hurt dumbo?
his a sore loser just like u

we already know who was clearly feeling messed up after the fight

do you want a rematch?
JMM: "im thinking retirement" now thats messed up

[Toyman]

someone already said earlier and its worth repeating:


you dont need slow motion to see why pac won.

but if you think jmm won [and especially if you thinnk he won clearly (lol)] then you definitely need it


the people analyzinng in slow mo are just doing the work for you.

[BoxingGenius27]

I'm still waiting to hear the slow mo professionals opinion on Johnson vs Froch. I'm eating popcorn as I type in suspense.

[FloydPacquiaoJr]

[IMG]http://*****************/cache/instances/400x/10/11238/11507833.jpg[/IMG]