Question: Pac vs jmm iii

[andotsky]

If a footstomp is something that could not be avoided between a southpaw and an orthodox fighter, how come there wasn't one on there first 2 fights?

[clmags12]

If a footstomp is something that could not be avoided between a southpaw and an orthodox fighter, how come there wasn't one on there first 2 fights?

Manny had more movement in I and II. His plan of countering Jmm III also allowed Manny to be there when Juan came forward.

[Big_L]

how do you know there wasn't? you watched them both that closely?

[andotsky]

how do you know there wasn't? you watched them both that closely?

yes, i did...and just in case you have no copy of it, 2008 fight is still on youtube and you could watch there first fight from here...

http://www.allthebestfights.com/pacquiao-vs-marquez-full-fight-video-pelea-2004/

[clmags12]

yes, i did...and just in case you have no copy of it, 2008 fight is still on youtube and you could watch there first fight from here...

http://www.allthebestfights.com/pacq...eo-pelea-2004/

Bro props for being so observant. I would think foot stomps can easily be seen as an accident or if its a clear foul. It would get called out right away. Which is why I dont take too much stock in them, it happens unintentionally.

[WitherGlove]

If a footstomp is something that could not be avoided between a southpaw and an orthodox fighter, how come there wasn't one on there first 2 fights?

Seriously man stop reaching Pac won be happy with the decision because in the end that's all really matters.

[Big_L]

yes, i did...and just in case you have no copy of it, 2008 fight is still on youtube and you could watch there first fight from here...

http://www.allthebestfights.com/pacq...eo-pelea-2004/

you didn't watch close enough then. 1:09 marquez steps on his foot. and thats the first video i watched. so i'm sure there are many more.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SE5oQnhMbRM