marquez looked strong and he fought great. I thought the end result was similar to the second fight - a point. I think people screaming robbery are the ones that didn't expect marquez to do this well, but like I knew going into the fight it was going to be a very competitive fight. Nothing upside down about it they fight like this every time.
Comments Thread For: Pacquiao-Marquez: Three Fights Later, Still No Closure
Collapse
-
Contrary to what Lampley and Stewart were saying, i thought Marquez controlled the fight and got Pacquiao to fight frustrated and at times desperate. Was a good fight and Manny is a great champ but when Pacquiao attempted to become a counterpuncher instead of his usual all out attack, showed how effective Marquez was in getting Manny out of his own game plan. And yet all the broadcasters could do was praise Mannys footwork. Im not crying robbery and understand this fight could of gone either way, but i thought Marquez won the fight with more combos landed and accurate punching. The only good thing about Pacman winning in such debatable fashion, is that Floyd Jr should be jumping at the chance of counterpunching his way to 60 million and a victory. However i will say that even though Marquez makes it look easy, you need a lot of Heart, Desire, and Balls to last 12 rounds with Pacman. That laying on the ropes chit will get you KOed... you gonna have to go Toe to Toe with MannyComment
-
no i did not....i said this would be highly competitve fight just like the other 2 fights....check out el chicano's thread mofo ...Comment
-
bull****, you said in the thread that got deleted that marquez can make all the excuses he want's like david haye about having a sore on his foot, he was still going to get ktfo. Quit trying to deny it.Comment
-

How you arrived at that conclusion?Comment
-
I hope Marquez will learn that he cannot win in the eye's of the judges with his style's fighting PAC.he should try knocking out PAC.I think he has a good chance, And Be side's every one thinks Marquez has a better & clearer punch than PAC.
But the thing is i never saw PAC getting floored in their TRILOGY.
Comment
-
I think the over-all consensus, whether youre a Marquez or Pacquiao fan, was that the fight is thinly close. It would be contradictory, hence, for people to say its a robbery. There are many swing rounds which made the score as it is and the fight is to be decided only by 3 persons. A robbery should be a "dominating" fight which was decided otherwise. It wasnt the case here.
Given that the outcome had the two fighters almost at equal, the champion gets the belt.
Marquez had the burden to dominate Manny being the champion, but his coach made him believe he was leading.
The 12th round, had Marquez put more oooppmh could have changed
114-114 would be 115-113 Marquez
113-115 would be 114-114 Draw
112-116 would be 113-115 Pacquiao
Nacho ****ed up bigtime. Again.Comment
-
Comment


Comment