Comments Thread For: Roach: Pacquiao Must Be Intelligent With Marquez
Collapse
-
without even trying?? he try very hard to do the same the rest of the fight ...
but he failed LOLComment
-
lol are you serious? Then what was Pacquiao doing exactly in the 2 fights if he wasn't trying I don't get itComment
-
dude. Marquez is practically the ONLY fighter who gave manny serious problems. and the guy has ridiculous stamina/determination to get up after three knockdowns and fight for the rest of the twelve rounds.
though i give manny the upper hand in this fight since its at 144 (shoulda been 140 IMHO) this is in no way a walk in the park.Comment
-
why is its every moron ******* like yourself only see the knockdown rounds which were 2 out of 24 rounds?????? what about the rest of the two fights was pac trying then?? if pac is soo great how come he went 24 rounds with Jmm??and got his butt kicked in the majority of them I might add, if he wasnt trying why did PAC get outconnected by 20 punches in the first fight then by almost 40 in the second fight???Pac didnt look like no winner thats for sure. Now manroids is a welter fighting a 38 yr old liteweight albeit a great one, I DONT SEE THE GLORY OR GREATNESS IN MANNY.JMM done whupped that azz twice in a row,more rounds won,more punches landed=won both fights get over it end of story.,**** the judges ,the numbers dont lie, idiot.Comment
-
not to mention that was a 1 handed, inexperienced pac.
if you sit back and think about it; thats really impressive because we all know he really won that fight were it not for the judges admitting to robbing him.Comment
-
Manny looked like a dam bobblehead doll,in both those fights and ate the most leather by far in both of them too ,and people are on here crapping on JMM whom are you guys kidding???people still have their butt hurt thats why they hate JMM its all true manny may have beat bigger bums but he never really beat JMM,he knocked down JMM but beat him?? **** NAW!even if pac wins now that he has every conceivable advantage I bet JMM makes him looks like **** at the very least,hell if shotter than shiaat mosley could make manny look like shiat .......Comment
-
If u sit back and think its not impressive to get outlanded by very significant margins in both fights such as manny did and claim your a winner,from where is he a winner????? cuz he ate more punches??thats not the name of the game last time i checked.if anyone was robbed it was Jmm,pacs kncokdowns were great and clean,but that was one round of each fight. what about the rest of the fights???.to me what gets me is pacfans wont even acknowledge the other 22 rounds,because manny didnt look too good eating soo much leather, the most leather out of the two to boot.A guy that ate 40 more punches as manny did in the 2nd fight,and lost the majority of the rounds as manny did didnt deserve no victory JMM was robbed bigtime especially in the second fight.punch for punch JMM won them both ,round by round jMM won them both the only reason manny got a draw and a 1point split dec. was because hes manny nothing more,anybody else woulda got what they deserved 2 losses.1st fight pac ate 17 more punches,than jmm,2nd fight 38 more,pac lost the overwhelming majority of rounds in both too winnner??????maybe if your delusional.all this one handed shiat is just hogwash he couldnt convicingly beat JMM end of story.Comment
-
lemme put in simpler terms,did cotto beat manny because manny landed like a million more punches on him?? did margs beat manny for the same reason? ,what about mosley,hatton,clottey??why did manny win those fights??? because he LANDED THE MOST PUNCHES AND WON THE MOST ROUNDS RIGHT?? according to ******* logic pacman lost all his last 5 fights, because eating more punches and losing more rounds is WINNING????JMM won the most rnds against pac and landed the most punches by and far in both fights,the judges jobbed him,if manny wins by ko this time around the first two fights wont change JMM took them both the numbers dont lie.Comment


Comment