I scored the fight a draw. But I must say Katsidis looked far from his old self. His movement was sluggish and his punches were sloppy and unprecise, lacked sharpness. He did manage to land two or three good combinations, but he had problems penetrating Bums' defence. And btw, FUK BURNS/BUMS! That ugly bum had a great height and reach advantage, it was an unfair fight, a mismatch! All he had to do was stretch his arms to hit Katsidis and then lay against the ropes and cover his face up like a bitx. Unfair fight. But Katsidis is obviously on the slide, remember last year when he destroyed Mitchell in 3 rounds?? This was just a shell of that Katsidis.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Anybody else thought Katsidis was robbed?
Collapse
-
-
It's a good thing you made this thread, was starting to wonder where all the NSB idiocy had gone.
If you had Kats winning, you were obviously watching a different fight. Burns deserves a lot of credit for the win.
Kats that fought Burns was the same Kats that fought Mitchell.
Comment
-
-
The fight was closer than what the judges scored but Burns did enough to win anyway.
I presume you are a fan of Kats you do realize describing Burns as a bum is just as disrespectful to Kats as it is to Burns. Kats accepted his defeat like a man you should take a leaf out of his book.
Burns came in with the right plan and did what he had to do.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pastrano View PostIAnd btw, FUK BURNS/BUMS! That ugly bum had a great height and reach advantage, it was an unfair fight, a mismatch! All he had to do was stretch his arms to hit Katsidis and then lay against the ropes and cover his face up like a bitx. Unfair fight.
Burns boxed instead of brawling with Katsidis. UNFAIR!
Burns didnt let Katsidis punch him in the face! UNFAIR!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Demise View PostIt's a good thing you made this thread, was starting to wonder where all the NSB idiocy had gone.
If you had Kats winning, you were obviously watching a different fight. Burns deserves a lot of credit for the win.
Kats that fought Burns was the same Kats that fought Mitchell.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Demise View PostIt's a good thing you made this thread, was starting to wonder where all the NSB idiocy had gone.
If you had Kats winning, you were obviously watching a different fight. Burns deserves a lot of credit for the win.
Kats that fought Burns was the same Kats that fought Mitchell.
Comment
-
Originally posted by -Lowkey- View PostThe fight was closer than what the judges scored but Burns did enough to win anyway.
I presume you are a fan of Kats you do realize describing Burns as a bum is just as disrespectful to Kats as it is to Burns. Kats accepted his defeat like a man you should take a leaf out of his book.
Burns came in with the right plan and did what he had to do.Last edited by Pastrano; 11-08-2011, 08:57 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pastrano View PostSee, you just exposed YOU are the idiot! I said it was a draw, fool. And saying this Kats is the same that beat Mitchell furthermore cements your idiocy. You keep digging your hole.
You also have to remember the state Mitchell came into the ring against Kats he was going through well documented personal problems (I believe he still is) and he had a terrible training camp.
Kats may well be on the slide but if you take the kind of punishment Kats does in everyone of his fight you will never get any longevity in the boxing game.
Burns was stepping up in weight and was the underdog he should get props for close but deserved win.
Comment
Comment