Juan Manuel Marquez weight: 141LBs!!!
Collapse
-
i guarantee manny will come in at 141ish just to shut up the ignorant haters who don't know their ass from both hands when it comes to analyzing pugilism. . .
PACSMASH. . . WILL SMASH!! Things pacsmash like to smash: opponents face, white rice, puzzy. . .Comment
-
I'll bet you 500k points that he won't weigh under 141.Comment
-
lol. Funny thing is. Marquez probably had to gain weight to get there.
While Manny is cutting weight to get there.Comment
-
lol people act like marquez is some small lightweight who doesn't have to cut to make the weight. . . this extra 5-7 pounds is going to BENEFIT HIM because he will be that much fresher. . . but the haters and excuse makers can't grasp these concepts.Comment
-
ill bet you 3 million points he comes in at 142. . . you just give me 250k if he comes in *UNDER 142. . . so 142 and under, i win. . . 142 and over, you win 3 million points. . . to make things even MORE fair. . . if manny rehydrates to more than a pound heavier than marquez on fight night, ill give you 5 million points.Last edited by UglyPug; 11-06-2011, 09:23 PM.Comment
-
nah, rather than restrict caloric intake marquez simply is able to eat whatever he wants now coupled with vigorous workout regimens. . . same thing as manny. . marquez has to cut weight to make 135. .
neither really has to "cut" weight to get to around 142-144. . . they both walk around at about 150. . . but when they start exercising and training they get down to low 140's. . .Comment
-
True. I remember him talking about eating tacos and lifting rocks when he was going to fight mayweather.
Comment
-
Okay... soill bet you 3 million points he comes in at 142. . . you just give me 250k if he comes in *UNDER 142. . . so 142 and under, i win. . . 142 and over, you win 3 million points. . . to make things even MORE fair. . . if manny rehydrates to more than a pound heavier than marquez on fight night, ill give you 5 million points.
Manny <= 142 you win
Manny > 142 I win
Manny < rehydrates 1 pound I win.
Did I get that right?Comment

Comment