The worst pro records you have seen?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • *OG Wenger*
    Paid da cost 2 be da boss
    • Jun 2010
    • 4851
    • 241
    • 207
    • 16,604

    #1

    The worst pro records you have seen?

    I just come across this one. He is fighting on the undercard at Wembley Arena tonight.

    http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hum...5019&cat=boxer
  • Guest
    • 0
    • 0
    • 0

    #2
    Originally posted by OG Wenger
    I just come across this one. He is fighting on the undercard at Wembley Arena tonight.

    http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hum...5019&cat=boxer

    The Strickland clan Reggie, Jerry, Jay etc have over 400 losses.

    Comment

    • D-MiZe
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2009
      • 25073
      • 1,061
      • 371
      • 75,542

      #3
      http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hum...4129&cat=boxer

      Comment

      • Sparked_1985
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jan 2009
        • 7250
        • 226
        • 71
        • 14,112

        #4
        To only get stopped 8 times in a 104 losses ain't bad.

        Especially, given how early our refs stop fights.

        Comment

        • New England
          Strong champion.
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2010
          • 37514
          • 1,926
          • 1,486
          • 97,173

          #5
          these guys might not have a ton of talent


          but can you imagine how experienced they are?


          my favorite is reggie strickland

          he's a journeyman in the states with close to 300 losses

          Comment

          • sebspeed
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jan 2008
            • 1142
            • 91
            • 122
            • 8,162

            #6
            The Stricklands have the worst record in the history of boxing, but you have to give them props because they haven't been stopped a lot and Reggie even once said he was never hurt in is carreer good for 300 losses. They fought a bunch of future champions.

            For me, the worst record ever is this guy.... http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hum...5316&cat=boxer

            Comment

            • Sparked_1985
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jan 2009
              • 7250
              • 226
              • 71
              • 14,112

              #7
              Originally posted by sebspeed
              The Stricklands have the worst record in the history of boxing, but you have to give them props because they haven't been stopped a lot and Reggie even once said he was never hurt in is carreer good for 300 losses. They fought a bunch of future champions.

              For me, the worst record ever is this guy.... http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hum...5316&cat=boxer
              That's the winner right there.

              I wouldn't mind fighting him.

              Comment

              • bobo_bobo
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Apr 2008
                • 228
                • 6
                • 2
                • 6,952

                #8
                Here's three human punching bags:

                1. Eric Crumble:
                won 0 (KO 0) + lost 31 (KO 31) + drawn 0 = 32
                Loss percentage: 100%, KO'd: 100%
                http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hum...5316&cat=boxer

                2. Reggie Strickland:
                won 66 (KO 14) + lost 276 (KO 25) + drawn 17 = 363
                Loss percentage: 76%, KO'd: 9%
                http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hum...4741&cat=boxer

                3. Peter Buckley
                won 32 (KO 8) + lost 256 (KO 10) + drawn 12 = 300
                Loss percentage: 85%, KO'd: 4%
                http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hum...3372&cat=boxer

                Comment

                • Guest
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  • 0

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Sparked_1985
                  That's the winner right there.

                  I wouldn't mind fighting him.
                  He lives up to his name.

                  When the going gets tough you can count on him to crumble.

                  Comment

                  • Sparked_1985
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 7250
                    • 226
                    • 71
                    • 14,112

                    #10
                    Originally posted by jreckoning
                    He lives up to his name.

                    When the going gets tough you can count on him to crumble.
                    Seems like a con man to be fair. Even if he was crap he should have seen the 2nd round more than that. Audley fought three rounds without throwing a punch and he was terrified.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP