I thought he should've won by 1 won point, but the draw would've been fair. He didn't win convincingly, so it wasn't a robbery.
Agree, some of the rounds were close - all of them were really. I had it 76-76, so seeing two cards 77-75 wasn't outlandish. He fought a very good fight but Gonzales slowed down his momentum in rounds 6 and 7.
I thought he should've won by 1 won point, but the draw would've been fair. He didn't win convincingly, so it wasn't a robbery.
I thought he won almost every round except 1 or 2.
It was a total BS decision, promoter cooking for his "undefeated" fighter by adding another loss to a journeyman.
This happens way too often, Ossima Duran outclassed and out hearted that bum, he was 100x better technically and was pushing the fight and landing the cleaner, harder shots. I dont know why that cheap ass Goossen would even waste money on this bum, he is 32 years old and completely sucks, shouldve used that bribe money on better scouts.
I thought he won almost every round except 1 or 2.
It was a total BS decision, promoter cooking for his "undefeated" fighter by adding another loss to a journeyman.
This happens way too often, Ossima Duran outclassed and out hearted that bum, he was 100x better technically and was pushing the fight and landing the cleaner, harder shots. I dont know why that cheap ass Goossen would even waste money on this bum, he is 32 years old and completely sucks, shouldve used that bribe money on better scouts.
I don't know if you were here last week or saw the fight between Edwin Rodriguez vs Will Rosinsky. Most of us on the site had the fight a draw, all 3 judges had the fight 100-90, people spectating from the front the ring had the fight for Rodriguez winning convincingly including "The ICEMAN" and a couple others.
Now I know the judges were way off in that fight, but it goes to show how hard it is to judge a fight from different prespective while both fighters are going toe-to-toe. Neither beat their opponent like Lara did to Pwill, when they do, then we can start using the word robbery.
99 out of 100 times a prospect wins a split decision or it is a draw, you know damn well the other guy won. RARELY do they give a close fight to the non-prospect. Boxing is fixed and needs to be investigated. The other guy has to knock out the prospect to get a draw, just as Atlas would say.
99 out of 100 times a prospect wins a split decision or it is a draw, you know damn well the other guy won. RARELY do they give a close fight to the non-prospect. Boxing is fixed and needs to be investigated. The other guy has to knock out the prospect to get a draw, just as Atlas would say.
I don't know if you were here last week or saw the fight between Edwin Rodriguez vs Will Rosinsky. Most of us on the site had the fight a draw, all 3 judges had the fight 100-90, people spectating from the front the ring had the fight for Rodriguez winning convincingly including "The ICEMAN" and a couple others.
Now I know the judges were way off in that fight, but it goes to show how hard it is to judge a fight from different prespective while both fighters are going toe-to-toe. Neither beat their opponent like Lara did to Pwill, when they do, then we can start using the word robbery.
This wasnt an action fight with alot of Punches thrown. It was easy to judge this fight, you could tell who had the proper technique and punches, it wasnt a barn burner or a snooze fest with 5 punches a round.
Ossima was a class better imo. The fact that the one judge had it right I was shocked to see the 2 other NY judges get it totally wrong.
Julie Lederman like her father is way past her prime, I dont trust their judging, it took a while but you can predict his scores, he/she have their own biases on what they use to score fights.
ie: Fighter A throws 50 Punches, 48 of them miss or are dodged and 2 land somewhere on arm or graze the face and Fighter B will throw 25 punches with 15-20 of them landing flush on the face.
99.9999% of the time Julie/Harold will give Fighter A the round either because they are old and senile or just plain biased.
Comment