Ran out of things to talk about then have we...
Would Amir Khan be the star that he is without his good looks?
Collapse
-
You have said what I was thinking, but in a more direct way. There's no accounting for taste and we often see the most oddly matched couples. But certainly, on a scale of 1-10, for "good looks" in my opinion, which is rather better than most, Khan would be at around a
3-4, maximum. He doesn't even have a single "good looking" feature, except his bank baklance.
We, including myself, are really foolish for even making this a subject for discussion.
As for De La Hoya, whom someone mentioned. He is a bit higher on the scale. I have very rigorous standards in this matter. What I notice most is his tiny nose and huge jaw and large cheeks. Perfect for a 6prizefighter. There are and have been multitudes who are far "better looking" than he.Never understood all the hoopla about his appearance. He himself is a narcissist, as was shown by his displaying himself in womens' clothing, byt there are some who sre in lo e with themselves. He is or was, one.
And we mustn't forget that posed camera shots are just that, posed to take advantage of light, shadow, angles etc.to minimize and maximize any good or bad features. Then they're manipulated in the photo lab. and we see only the acceptable ones. They are not "cell phone flashes"............Comment
-
You have said what I was thinking, but in a more direct way. There's no accounting for taste and we often see the most oddly matched couples. But certainly, on a scale of 1-10, for "good looks" in my opinion, which is rather better than most, Khan would be at around a
3-4, maximum. He doesn't even have a single "good looking" feature, except his bank baklance.
We, including myself, are really foolish for even making this a subject for discussion.
As for De La Hoya, whom someone mentioned. He is a bit higher on the scale. I have very rigorous standards in this matter. What I notice most is his tiny nose and huge jaw and large cheeks. Perfect for a 6prizefighter. There are and have been multitudes who are far "better looking" than he.Never understood all the hoopla about his appearance. He himself is a narcissist, as was shown by his displaying himself in womens' clothing, byt there are some who sre in lo e with themselves. He is or was, one.
And we mustn't forget that posed camera shots are just that, posed to take advantage of light, shadow, angles etc.to minimize and maximize any good or bad features. Then they're manipulated in the photo lab. and we see only the acceptable ones. They are not "cell phone flashes"............
Comment
-
-
the only thing thats mystrerious is how he aint been knocked out again, but fighting a load of bums would do that i geus, as for been good looking thats just another con.Comment
-
Comment
-
Probably not. Even then, he isn't given all the respect he should be given. Even Brits dislike the guy.Comment
-
Comment
Comment