Lederman is one of the only unbiased guys at HBO.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Lederman on Pacquiao-Bradley, Mayweather-Khan, More
Collapse
-
-
I agree with most of what Lederman says, although he's wrong about the Gatti-Ward trilogy. Only their first fight was a "blood and thunder" fight. The second showed a completely changed Gatti who won easily with one-sided science and poise, but not nearly as "active" as the first fight. And the third fight was a "one- sided-walk-over" for Gatti, about a 2 on a scale of 1-10.
Comment
-
Lederman is not biased in favor of certain fighters, such as Lampley with his HBO house fighter shilling or everlasting man-love for Barrera. Lederman, however, favors aggression too much, even when the aggressor is eating most of the clean punches. For instance, giving Hatton 4 of the first 7 rounds against Mayweather. He also had Jesus Chavez beating Floyd after 7. He had Toney-Jirov even.
Other times, his cards are plain bizarre. Didn't he have Williams beating Quintana in their first fight?
Comment
-
Originally posted by PED User View PostLederman is not biased in favor of certain fighters, such as Lampley with his HBO house fighter shilling or everlasting man-love for Barrera. Lederman, however, favors aggression too much, even when the aggressor is eating most of the clean punches. For instance, giving Hatton 4 of the first 7 rounds against Mayweather. He also had Jesus Chavez beating Floyd after 7. He had Toney-Jirov even.
Other times, his cards are plain bizarre. Didn't he have Williams beating Quintana in their first fight?
I believe yea he did have Williams winning that fightLast edited by The Gambler1981; 10-26-2011, 11:05 PM.
Comment
Comment