Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Lederman on Pacquiao-Bradley, Mayweather-Khan, More

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Lederman is one of the only unbiased guys at HBO.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by gdub27 View Post
      Lederman is one of the only unbiased guys at HBO.
      Hmmmm.... ever see a Lederman scored card in some fights he covers?

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by gdub27 View Post
        Lederman is one of the only unbiased guys at HBO.
        lederman is full of ****.. he's a hater too.. just cause he old and smile alot don't mean ****.. he paid to hype up bums too. he does work for hbo..

        Comment


        • #14
          I agree with most of what Lederman says, although he's wrong about the Gatti-Ward trilogy. Only their first fight was a "blood and thunder" fight. The second showed a completely changed Gatti who won easily with one-sided science and poise, but not nearly as "active" as the first fight. And the third fight was a "one- sided-walk-over" for Gatti, about a 2 on a scale of 1-10.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by GRUSTLER View Post
            Hmmmm.... ever see a Lederman scored card in some fights he covers?
            Lmao this ish right here is exactly what went thru my head!!!

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by jibbajabber View Post
              lederman is full of ****.. He's a hater too.. Just cause he old and smile alot don't mean ****.. He paid to hype up bums too. He does work for hbo..
              ????

              Jim !!!!

              Comment


              • #17
                Lederman is not biased in favor of certain fighters, such as Lampley with his HBO house fighter shilling or everlasting man-love for Barrera. Lederman, however, favors aggression too much, even when the aggressor is eating most of the clean punches. For instance, giving Hatton 4 of the first 7 rounds against Mayweather. He also had Jesus Chavez beating Floyd after 7. He had Toney-Jirov even.

                Other times, his cards are plain bizarre. Didn't he have Williams beating Quintana in their first fight?

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by PED User View Post
                  Lederman is not biased in favor of certain fighters, such as Lampley with his HBO house fighter shilling or everlasting man-love for Barrera. Lederman, however, favors aggression too much, even when the aggressor is eating most of the clean punches. For instance, giving Hatton 4 of the first 7 rounds against Mayweather. He also had Jesus Chavez beating Floyd after 7. He had Toney-Jirov even.

                  Other times, his cards are plain bizarre. Didn't he have Williams beating Quintana in their first fight?
                  Usually Lederman is pretty easy to read, with like 90%+ accuracy I can call who he will score a round for before it comes up, people always love it when I do that at parties. Occasionally I am wrong but for him to not pick the aggressor it is generally plain as day (maybe even beyond that) the other guy is out boxing the aggressor.

                  I believe yea he did have Williams winning that fight
                  Last edited by The Gambler1981; 10-26-2011, 11:05 PM.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP