By Lyle Fitzsimmons - Sometimes, it’s fun to be a boxing writer.
Aside from the weeks where the inbox is muddled with idiocy and others that are consumed by fallout when major events fall short, it’s sort of cool to have stretches where something’s always happening.
We’re in the middle of one of those right now.
For me, it started a couple weeks ago with the annual voting column for the International Boxing Hall of Fame. Seems the post-ballot piece in which I labeled Joe Frazier as “criminally” non-deserving of his place in Canastota has gotten more than a few people rankled.
I stand by my assertion that Joe doesn’t belong. And I continue to find it amusing that, rather than pointing to his resume to argue their cases for induction, those who disagree with me instead say, “Well, sure he’s questionable, but there are far worse reaches in there than him.”
Not exactly the way they teach verbal parry in debate class.
But I don’t necessarily disagree.
In retrospect, our man Joe may not be the first guy worthy of a culling, only the most celebrated and overrated inductee in proportion to his actual resume.
And if it’ll make anyone/everyone happy, I concede there are others now in the Hall who’d be better left on the does-not-qualify list as well – one Barry McGuigan, for example.
But please, for those even considering Arturo Gatti as ballot material, I beg of you… don’t.
Let’s not go through this again next year. [Click Here To Read More]
Aside from the weeks where the inbox is muddled with idiocy and others that are consumed by fallout when major events fall short, it’s sort of cool to have stretches where something’s always happening.
We’re in the middle of one of those right now.
For me, it started a couple weeks ago with the annual voting column for the International Boxing Hall of Fame. Seems the post-ballot piece in which I labeled Joe Frazier as “criminally” non-deserving of his place in Canastota has gotten more than a few people rankled.
I stand by my assertion that Joe doesn’t belong. And I continue to find it amusing that, rather than pointing to his resume to argue their cases for induction, those who disagree with me instead say, “Well, sure he’s questionable, but there are far worse reaches in there than him.”
Not exactly the way they teach verbal parry in debate class.
But I don’t necessarily disagree.
In retrospect, our man Joe may not be the first guy worthy of a culling, only the most celebrated and overrated inductee in proportion to his actual resume.
And if it’ll make anyone/everyone happy, I concede there are others now in the Hall who’d be better left on the does-not-qualify list as well – one Barry McGuigan, for example.
But please, for those even considering Arturo Gatti as ballot material, I beg of you… don’t.
Let’s not go through this again next year. [Click Here To Read More]
Comment