Comments Thread For: Tim Bradley: I'm Not Ducking Khan, He's On The List!

[Hasha]

Sign the contract big head... sign the contract...

[jmmfan]

Bradley's ****** for not destroying Con when he had the chance.

[Marshall89]

He never had the chance, he can't even destroy half of the bums he fights!!
He can't destroy Khan, Yu need a set of bollocks to destroy anyone.
Hows about yu STFU Timothy yu little flapper boiiiii, turn Khan down twice and get stripped of your belt, and fight an ageing Casamayor who probably needs a ****ing hip replacement!

He says Khans on 'the list'. Yeah, he probably is on 'the list' but not right now when he knows he will lose his unbeaten record to him, no question!
He will call Khan out maybe the next time Khan loses a fight or when he needs the money after he gets Knocked the Fcuk out by Pacquiao (I can't even see him going up to 147 to fight the big boys).
He'll stay at LWW, get his WBC belt back from another on the hip replacement list in Morales, and then take the belts that Khan vacates by moving up to 147!!
He'll get these belts, keep his 0 with a real poor Knockout ratio, unify the division, duck all the best fighters at LWW, no chance of WW IMO, and start claiming he's better than Ali and Sugar Ray Robinson and he doesn't need the fights with the big boys.

Sound Familiar *****s?? But it's different with Floyd, he moves up weight divisions, beats a poor champion he knows he can beat, flaps to a fight with a better boxer and moves to a next weight class to win a belt, against another poor(er than him) champion.
He ent never gonna step into the ring with a top boxer unless theyre on a serious decline or soon to turn 40 years of age...

[Rome-By-Ko]

Let people say what they want about Bradley, they all will find out soon. The man is a warrior and is undefeated.Boxing is a business and he wants to make the most money he possibly can before he retires. There's nothing wrong with that. Sure, he should have kept his mouth closed and not called out Khan until his business matters were straight. But at the time, he wanted Khan. Arum got in his ear while the negotiations were going on. He promised him Pacquiao, so Tim backed out of it. I understand completely. What's not to understand??? Bradley will be the man to beat Manny if Floyd doesn't get to him first.Sounds crazy, but all the great ones lose sooner or later.Tim has the style and the ability to take it to Manny. Don't be shocked if it happens. But here's my question. Why did Arum sign Tim? Like him or not,Arum is a smart business man. He knows Manny only has a few fights left.Wouldn't it be smart to sign the other fighter that's capable of beating him and keep the big fights rolling? Arum knows the type of man and fighter that Tim is. If Tim beats Manny, then its out with the old and in with the new. In Arums mind, he know he just signed the future premier fighter of Top Rank!

You speak a lot of sense sir...

[Convicted_Felon]

Aflac!!!

What list? The 'duck that fighter NOW list'? Aflac...Major Medical Boyeee. Pays the doctors boyee.

[carlos djackal]

I'll take Bradley's word that it was a business decision. He wanted out of his promoter for bigger opportunities and can't blame him for that. His former promoter has done a pathetic job to market him. With Bob he's got a brigther future. Amir will have his wish soon and good luck to him, Bradley is a real deal.

[mshap]

no reason for Bradley to duck Khan -- would make him a slight but very live underdog iif they fight -- if Bradley does beat Kahn, it would just be a mild upset, if that....

[LeadUppercut]

He never had the chance, he can't even destroy half of the bums he fights!!
He can't destroy Khan, Yu need a set of bollocks to destroy anyone.
Hows about yu STFU Timothy yu little flapper boiiiii, turn Khan down twice and get stripped of your belt, and fight an ageing Casamayor who probably needs a ****ing hip replacement!

He says Khans on 'the list'. Yeah, he probably is on 'the list' but not right now when he knows he will lose his unbeaten record to him, no question!
He will call Khan out maybe the next time Khan loses a fight or when he needs the money after he gets Knocked the Fcuk out by Pacquiao (I can't even see him going up to 147 to fight the big boys).
He'll stay at LWW, get his WBC belt back from another on the hip replacement list in Morales, and then take the belts that Khan vacates by moving up to 147!!
He'll get these belts, keep his 0 with a real poor Knockout ratio, unify the division, duck all the best fighters at LWW, no chance of WW IMO, and start claiming he's better than Ali and Sugar Ray Robinson and he doesn't need the fights with the big boys.

Sound Familiar *****s?? But it's different with Floyd, he moves up weight divisions, beats a poor champion he knows he can beat, flaps to a fight with a better boxer and moves to a next weight class to win a belt, against another poor(er than him) champion.
He ent never gonna step into the ring with a top boxer unless theyre on a serious decline or soon to turn 40 years of age...

Truly great fighters always leave more answers than questions, and yet Pacquiao has left more questions than answers.

Questions like.....

* Could Pac have beaten Zahir Raheem, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten JMM in a rematch at 130, cuz he didnt want none?

* Could Pac have beaten a top lightweight, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a top jww, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a prime Hoya, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten Hoya at 154, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a prime Cotto, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten Cotto at 147, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a prime Margarito, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten Margarito at 154, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten Margarito with 10oz gloves, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a Clottey that fought back, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a genuine jmw, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a prime Mosley, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a past-prime Mosley when he first had the chance back when Shane was ranked the #1 welter, cuz he didnt want none?

* Could Pac have beaten Ortiz (a guy who laid hands on him in sparring - Roach named that session as "the best sparring ever", a guy who beat a fighter who Arum admitted was on Pac's own shortlist, and a guy who was ranked higher than any welter Pac has ever fought), cuz he didnt want none?

* Could Pac beat JMM now at 140 (Pac's best weight, according to Manny), cuz he will not allow that to happen, 145lbs (a weight that Manny has never made himself ) was the deal-breaker? *** me, that is absurd.

* Could Pac have beaten Martinez for that vacant WBC title, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac beat Martinez at 150 now ("I will fight anyone at 150" ~ Manny Pacquiao), cuz he dont want none? Pac? Manny? Where'd that guy go?

* Could Pac beat Mayweather, cuz he hasnt?

* Could Pac pass Olympic Style Drug Testing, cuz he dont want none?

Jeez dude, that is one helluva shopping list full of unanswered questions about a supposedly great fighter

I mean, that list is not complete either, **** we can go right back to fly, could Pac have beaten Too Sharp? Why didnt that fight happen, just like at lw, jww, and welter?

WTF ?

Surely that cant be right, because Pacquiao certainly had not achieved traditional greatness before the highly controversial win/loss to Marquez?

Many fighters achieved greatness by fighting under the old divisional system, back when there was only one champion, using same day weigh-in's, and they did it by fighting as the smaller man..... Pacquiao has certainly never done anything like that.

Are you sure that you arent just drinking the kool-aid dude ?

Because it is inconceivable that a truly great fighter could have a list of unanswered questions hanging over his head that happens to be longer than his list of achievements?

Give yourself an uppercut for being so naive, Pac is a terrific fighter, and likely a great guy, but when Bob Arum admitted that all of the people who paid to watch Pac fight Margarito Mosley and Marquez knew that those guys didnt stand a chance, and that Manny is an "entertainer", he (in order).....
* looked you squarely in the eye
* p1ssed in your pocket
* told you that it was raining
* laughed in your face

FACT: Even my boy Carpentier was a better fighter than Pacquiao, and my boy Fitzy is hands down a level above him..... Burley was a much better fighter and he never won a title.

You guys are nuts, and I dont give a *** what ESPN, 60 minutes, fat old Merchant, blah, blah, says..... the old-time fighters are right, people are like parrots, and sheep, especially casual fans and idiots..... they all talked about Robinson being the best despite never having actually watched him fight because there was no footage available..... "oh, but saw it on, or I heard such-and-such say"..... , but never once bothering to compare him with Pep, who had a fkn phenomenal record early in his career and despite there being plenty of footage available.

I know what I know, you sheep can think what you like, but your boy is over-rated and has not fought a live dog since Marquez, and we all saw what happened there.

[Rome-By-Ko]

Truly great fighters always leave more answers than questions, and yet Pacquiao has left more questions than answers.

Questions like.....

* Could Pac have beaten Zahir Raheem, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten JMM in a rematch at 130, cuz he didnt want none?

* Could Pac have beaten a top lightweight, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a top jww, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a prime Hoya, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten Hoya at 154, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a prime Cotto, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten Cotto at 147, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a prime Margarito, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten Margarito at 154, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten Margarito with 10oz gloves, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a Clottey that fought back, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a genuine jmw, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a prime Mosley, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a past-prime Mosley when he first had the chance back when Shane was ranked the #1 welter, cuz he didnt want none?

* Could Pac have beaten Ortiz (a guy who laid hands on him in sparring - Roach named that session as "the best sparring ever", a guy who beat a fighter who Arum admitted was on Pac's own shortlist, and a guy who was ranked higher than any welter Pac has ever fought), cuz he didnt want none?

* Could Pac beat JMM now at 140 (Pac's best weight, according to Manny), cuz he will not allow that to happen, 145lbs (a weight that Manny has never made himself ) was the deal-breaker? *** me, that is absurd.

* Could Pac have beaten Martinez for that vacant WBC title, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac beat Martinez at 150 now ("I will fight anyone at 150" ~ Manny Pacquiao), cuz he dont want none? Pac? Manny? Where'd that guy go?

* Could Pac beat Mayweather, cuz he hasnt?

* Could Pac pass Olympic Style Drug Testing, cuz he dont want none?

Jeez dude, that is one helluva shopping list full of unanswered questions about a supposedly great fighter

I mean, that list is not complete either, **** we can go right back to fly, could Pac have beaten Too Sharp? Why didnt that fight happen, just like at lw, jww, and welter?

WTF ?

Surely that cant be right, because Pacquiao certainly had not achieved traditional greatness before the highly controversial win/loss to Marquez?

Many fighters achieved greatness by fighting under the old divisional system, back when there was only one champion, using same day weigh-in's, and they did it by fighting as the smaller man..... Pacquiao has certainly never done anything like that.

Are you sure that you arent just drinking the kool-aid dude ?

Because it is inconceivable that a truly great fighter could have a list of unanswered questions hanging over his head that happens to be longer than his list of achievements?

Give yourself an uppercut for being so naive, Pac is a terrific fighter, and likely a great guy, but when Bob Arum admitted that all of the people who paid to watch Pac fight Margarito Mosley and Marquez knew that those guys didnt stand a chance, and that Manny is an "entertainer", he (in order).....
* looked you squarely in the eye
* p1ssed in your pocket
* told you that it was raining
* laughed in your face

FACT: Even my boy Carpentier was a better fighter than Pacquiao, and my boy Fitzy is hands down a level above him..... Burley was a much better fighter and he never won a title.

You guys are nuts, and I dont give a *** what ESPN, 60 minutes, fat old Merchant, blah, blah, says..... the old-time fighters are right, people are like parrots, and sheep, especially casual fans and idiots..... they all talked about Robinson being the best despite never having actually watched him fight because there was no footage available..... "oh, but saw it on, or I heard such-and-such say"..... , but never once bothering to compare him with Pep, who had a fkn phenomenal record early in his career and despite there being plenty of footage available.

I know what I know, you sheep can think what you like, but your boy is over-rated and has not fought a live dog since Marquez, and we all saw what happened there.

Him,I truly don't expect a reply from him..Great post bro,

[Marshall89]

Truly great fighters always leave more answers than questions, and yet Pacquiao has left more questions than answers.

Questions like.....

* Could Pac have beaten Zahir Raheem, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten JMM in a rematch at 130, cuz he didnt want none?

* Could Pac have beaten a top lightweight, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a top jww, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a prime Hoya, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten Hoya at 154, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a prime Cotto, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten Cotto at 147, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a prime Margarito, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten Margarito at 154, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten Margarito with 10oz gloves, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a Clottey that fought back, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a genuine jmw, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a prime Mosley, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac have beaten a past-prime Mosley when he first had the chance back when Shane was ranked the #1 welter, cuz he didnt want none?

* Could Pac have beaten Ortiz (a guy who laid hands on him in sparring - Roach named that session as "the best sparring ever", a guy who beat a fighter who Arum admitted was on Pac's own shortlist, and a guy who was ranked higher than any welter Pac has ever fought), cuz he didnt want none?

* Could Pac beat JMM now at 140 (Pac's best weight, according to Manny), cuz he will not allow that to happen, 145lbs (a weight that Manny has never made himself ) was the deal-breaker? *** me, that is absurd.

* Could Pac have beaten Martinez for that vacant WBC title, cuz he didnt?

* Could Pac beat Martinez at 150 now ("I will fight anyone at 150" ~ Manny Pacquiao), cuz he dont want none? Pac? Manny? Where'd that guy go?

* Could Pac beat Mayweather, cuz he hasnt?

* Could Pac pass Olympic Style Drug Testing, cuz he dont want none?

Jeez dude, that is one helluva shopping list full of unanswered questions about a supposedly great fighter

I mean, that list is not complete either, **** we can go right back to fly, could Pac have beaten Too Sharp? Why didnt that fight happen, just like at lw, jww, and welter?

WTF ?

Surely that cant be right, because Pacquiao certainly had not achieved traditional greatness before the highly controversial win/loss to Marquez?

Many fighters achieved greatness by fighting under the old divisional system, back when there was only one champion, using same day weigh-in's, and they did it by fighting as the smaller man..... Pacquiao has certainly never done anything like that.

Are you sure that you arent just drinking the kool-aid dude ?

Because it is inconceivable that a truly great fighter could have a list of unanswered questions hanging over his head that happens to be longer than his list of achievements?

Give yourself an uppercut for being so naive, Pac is a terrific fighter, and likely a great guy, but when Bob Arum admitted that all of the people who paid to watch Pac fight Margarito Mosley and Marquez knew that those guys didnt stand a chance, and that Manny is an "entertainer", he (in order).....
* looked you squarely in the eye
* p1ssed in your pocket
* told you that it was raining
* laughed in your face

FACT: Even my boy Carpentier was a better fighter than Pacquiao, and my boy Fitzy is hands down a level above him..... Burley was a much better fighter and he never won a title.

You guys are nuts, and I dont give a *** what ESPN, 60 minutes, fat old Merchant, blah, blah, says..... the old-time fighters are right, people are like parrots, and sheep, especially casual fans and idiots..... they all talked about Robinson being the best despite never having actually watched him fight because there was no footage available..... "oh, but saw it on, or I heard such-and-such say"..... , but never once bothering to compare him with Pep, who had a fkn phenomenal record early in his career and despite there being plenty of footage available.

I know what I know, you sheep can think what you like, but your boy is over-rated and has not fought a live dog since Marquez, and we all saw what happened there.

Hooooooooly **** Fam. Haha
I just seen this yu know. I'm about to go out n i'll b back in about an hour, and by the looks of the size of this post it will take me long as f*** to reply still.

I'm baffled why you've switched this onto Pacquiao though ? When was Pacman mention bro? I'm no ******* so yur starting on the wrong geezer here if ya'll think i'm gonna be sucking his **** all day and comin out with bull**** replies like RomeByKo always does

Anyway i've read the first one or two lines and i agree with ya'll that Pac can sometimes called out on tings like cherrypicking n dat... As RomeByKo would say, it's a business n Manny makes good business decisions, Floyd's been doing this for years....

Write back properly later fam yeah