Tweet
All I have to say is R.I.P. Marquez. You had a wonderful career.
-
-
that's the problem with pac fights..for the last few years since he started fighting damaged goods at catch weight there is no thrill in his fights..in every fight he is meant to win easy because everyone knows that his opponent is lacking on something...back in the days before pac got to cherry pick he used to have some good fights...he used to get smashed but at least he delivered..now days him fighting top rank victims at catch weight..common man ..no real boxing fan enjoys that ****.Comment
-
Why would you make such a ****** post ?
Do you want everyone to think that you are an idiot ?
FACT: Most observers felt that Marquez won both fights, deal with it.
And if you cannot see that Marquez is being setup, and that he has little-to-no chance of winning this time around, then you should crawl back under your rock. Fkn dumb-arse.Comment
-
This message is hidden because Toyman is just an idiot kid.Comment
-
im surprised leaduppercunt still posts here.
you have ZERO credibility here, broComment
-
Well, I certainly have more than Manny " padded " Pacquiao.....
Truly great fighters always leave more answers than questions, and yet Pacquiao has left more questions than answers.
Questions like.....
* Could Pac have beaten Zahir Raheem, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten JMM in a rematch at 130, cuz he didnt want none?
* Could Pac have beaten a top lightweight, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten a top jww, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten a prime Hoya, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten Hoya at 154, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten a prime Cotto, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten Cotto at 147, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten a prime Margarito, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten Margarito at 154, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten Margarito with 10oz gloves, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten a Clottey that fought back, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten a genuine jmw, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten a prime Mosley, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten a past-prime Mosley when he first had the chance back when Shane was ranked the #1 welter, cuz he didnt want none?
* Could Pac have beaten Ortiz (a guy who laid hands on him in sparring - Roach named that session as "the best sparring ever", a guy who beat a fighter who Arum admitted was on Pac's own shortlist, and a guy who was ranked higher than any welter Pac has ever fought), cuz he didnt want none?
* Could Pac beat JMM now at 140 (Pac's best weight, according to Manny), cuz he will not allow that to happen, 145lbs (a weight that Manny has never made himself
) was the deal-breaker? *** me, that is absurd.
* Could Pac have beaten Martinez for that vacant WBC title, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac beat Martinez at 150 now ("I will fight anyone at 150" ~ Manny Pacquiao), cuz he dont want none? Pac? Manny? Where'd that guy go?
* Could Pac beat Mayweather, cuz he hasnt?
* Could Pac pass Olympic Style Drug Testing, cuz he dont want none?
Jeez dude, that is one helluva shopping list full of unanswered questions about a supposedly great fighter
I mean, that list is not complete either, **** we can go right back to fly, could Pac have beaten Too Sharp? Why didnt that fight happen, just like at lw, jww, and welter?
WTF ?
Surely that cant be right, because Pacquiao certainly had not achieved traditional greatness before the highly controversial win/loss to Marquez?
Many fighters achieved greatness by fighting under the old divisional system, back when there was only one champion, using same day weigh-in's, and they did it by fighting as the smaller man..... Pacquiao has certainly never done anything like that.
Are you sure that you arent just drinking the kool-aid dude ?
Because it is inconceivable that a truly great fighter could have a list of unanswered questions hanging over his head that happens to be longer than his list of achievements?
Give yourself an uppercut for being so naive, Pac is a terrific fighter, and likely a great guy, but when Bob Arum admitted that all of the people who paid to watch Pac fight Margarito Mosley and Marquez knew that those guys didnt stand a chance, and that Manny is an "entertainer", he (in order).....
* looked you squarely in the eye
* p1ssed in your pocket
* told you that it was raining
* laughed in your face
FACT: Even my boy Carpentier was a better fighter than Pacquiao, and my boy Fitzy is hands down a level above him..... Burley was a much better fighter and he never won a title.
You guys are nuts, and I dont give a *** what ESPN, 60 minutes, fat old Merchant, blah, blah, says..... the old-time fighters are right, people are like parrots, and sheep, especially casual fans and idiots..... they all talked about Robinson being the best despite never having actually watched him fight because there was no footage available..... "oh, but saw it on, or I heard such-and-such say"..... , but never once bothering to compare him with Pep, who had a fkn phenomenal record early in his career and despite there being plenty of footage available.
I know what I know, you sheep can think what you like, but your boy is over-rated and he cant sing for ****
Comment
-
lol leaduppercut actually thinks ppl read his wall of ****.Well, I certainly have more than Manny " padded " Pacquiao.....
Truly great fighters always leave more answers than questions, and yet Pacquiao has left more questions than answers.
Questions like.....
* Could Pac have beaten Zahir Raheem, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten JMM in a rematch at 130, cuz he didnt want none?
* Could Pac have beaten a top lightweight, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten a top jww, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten a prime Hoya, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten Hoya at 154, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten a prime Cotto, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten Cotto at 147, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten a prime Margarito, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten Margarito at 154, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten Margarito with 10oz gloves, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten a Clottey that fought back, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten a genuine jmw, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten a prime Mosley, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac have beaten a past-prime Mosley when he first had the chance back when Shane was ranked the #1 welter, cuz he didnt want none?
* Could Pac have beaten Ortiz (a guy who laid hands on him in sparring - Roach named that session as "the best sparring ever", a guy who beat a fighter who Arum admitted was on Pac's own shortlist, and a guy who was ranked higher than any welter Pac has ever fought), cuz he didnt want none?
* Could Pac beat JMM now at 140 (Pac's best weight, according to Manny), cuz he will not allow that to happen, 145lbs (a weight that Manny has never made himself) was the deal-breaker? *** me, that is absurd.
* Could Pac have beaten Martinez for that vacant WBC title, cuz he didnt?
* Could Pac beat Martinez at 150 now ("I will fight anyone at 150" ~ Manny Pacquiao), cuz he dont want none? Pac? Manny? Where'd that guy go?
* Could Pac beat Mayweather, cuz he hasnt?
* Could Pac pass Olympic Style Drug Testing, cuz he dont want none?
Jeez dude, that is one helluva shopping list full of unanswered questions about a supposedly great fighter
I mean, that list is not complete either, **** we can go right back to fly, could Pac have beaten Too Sharp? Why didnt that fight happen, just like at lw, jww, and welter?
WTF ?
Surely that cant be right, because Pacquiao certainly had not achieved traditional greatness before the highly controversial win/loss to Marquez?
Many fighters achieved greatness by fighting under the old divisional system, back when there was only one champion, using same day weigh-in's, and they did it by fighting as the smaller man..... Pacquiao has certainly never done anything like that.
Are you sure that you arent just drinking the kool-aid dude ?
Because it is inconceivable that a truly great fighter could have a list of unanswered questions hanging over his head that happens to be longer than his list of achievements?
Give yourself an uppercut for being so naive, Pac is a terrific fighter, and likely a great guy, but when Bob Arum admitted that all of the people who paid to watch Pac fight Margarito Mosley and Marquez knew that those guys didnt stand a chance, and that Manny is an "entertainer", he (in order).....
* looked you squarely in the eye
* p1ssed in your pocket
* told you that it was raining
* laughed in your face
FACT: Even my boy Carpentier was a better fighter than Pacquiao, and my boy Fitzy is hands down a level above him..... Burley was a much better fighter and he never won a title.
You guys are nuts, and I dont give a *** what ESPN, 60 minutes, fat old Merchant, blah, blah, says..... the old-time fighters are right, people are like parrots, and sheep, especially casual fans and idiots..... they all talked about Robinson being the best despite never having actually watched him fight because there was no footage available..... "oh, but saw it on, or I heard such-and-such say"..... , but never once bothering to compare him with Pep, who had a fkn phenomenal record early in his career and despite there being plenty of footage available.
I know what I know, you sheep can think what you like, but your boy is over-rated and he cant sing for ****
Comment
Comment