Let's see what the general consent is amongst the community.
I agree with the ruling because Hopkins JUMPED ON Dawson's back. Period. He jumped on him, tried to use his dirty tactics and Dawson let him know he wasn't going to tolerate it like other fighters have in the past. Hopkins can't win a fight without using dirty tactics.
IMO karma caught up with the dirtiest fighter in the sport. I'm happy with how things turned out. The stripping of his belt was just the icing on the cake for me. I was fine with what happened but I would have rather seen a normal fight with a non controversial outcome.
What are your thoughts punky boys??
Opinions?
I agree with the ruling because Hopkins JUMPED ON Dawson's back. Period. He jumped on him, tried to use his dirty tactics and Dawson let him know he wasn't going to tolerate it like other fighters have in the past. Hopkins can't win a fight without using dirty tactics.
IMO karma caught up with the dirtiest fighter in the sport. I'm happy with how things turned out. The stripping of his belt was just the icing on the cake for me. I was fine with what happened but I would have rather seen a normal fight with a non controversial outcome.
What are your thoughts punky boys??
Opinions?
Comment