Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: VisionQuest Seeking $650,000 in Manny Pacquiao Suit

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by LeadUppercut View Post
    Dude, your mantra doesnt work

    Because, it does not explain why truly great fighters always leave more answers than questions, and yet Pacquiao has left more questions than answers.

    Questions like.....

    * Could Pac have beaten Zahir Raheem, cuz he didnt?

    * Could Pac have beaten JMM in a rematch at 130, cuz he didnt want none?

    * Could Pac have beaten a top lightweight, cuz he didnt?

    * Could Pac have beaten a top jww, cuz he didnt?

    * Could Pac have beaten a prime Hoya, cuz he didnt?

    * Could Pac have beaten Hoya at 154, cuz he didnt?

    * Could Pac have beaten a prime Cotto, cuz he didnt?

    * Could Pac have beaten Cotto at 147, cuz he didnt?

    * Could Pac have beaten a prime Margarito, cuz he didnt?

    * Could Pac have beaten Margarito at 154, cuz he didnt?

    * Could Pac have beaten Margarito with 10oz gloves, cuz he didnt?

    * Could Pac have beaten a Clottey that fought back, cuz he didnt?

    * Could Pac have beaten a genuine jmw, cuz he didnt?

    * Could Pac have beaten a prime Mosley, cuz he didnt?

    * Could Pac have beaten a past-prime Mosley when he first had the chance back when Shane was ranked the #1 welter, cuz he didnt want none?

    * Could Pac have beaten Ortiz (a guy who laid hands on him in sparring - Roach named that session as "the best sparring ever", a guy who beat a fighter who Arum admitted was on Pac's own shortlist, and a guy who was ranked higher than any welter Pac has ever fought), cuz he didnt want none?

    * Could Pac beat JMM now at 140 (Pac's best weight, according to Manny), cuz he will not allow that to happen, 145lbs (a weight that Manny has never made himself ) was the deal-breaker? Fuk me, that is absurd.

    * Could Pac have beaten Martinez for that vacant WBC title, cuz he didnt?

    * Could Pac beat Martinez at 150 now ("I will fight anyone at 150" ~ Manny Pacquiao), cuz he dont want none? Pac? Manny? Where'd that guy go?

    * Could Pac beat Mayweather, cuz he hasnt?

    * Could Pac pass Olympic Style Drug Testing, cuz he dont want none?

    Jeez dude, that is one helluva shopping list full of unanswered questions about a supposedly great fighter

    I mean, that list is not complete either, **** we can go right back to fly, could Pac have beaten Too Sharp? Why didnt that fight happen, just like at lw, jww, and welter?

    WTF ?

    Surely that cant be right, because Pacquiao certainly had not achieved traditional greatness before the highly controversial win/loss to Marquez?

    Many fighters achieved greatness by fighting under the old divisional system, back when there was only one champion, using same day weigh-in's, and they did it by fighting as the smaller man..... Pacquiao has certainly never done anything like that.

    Are you sure that you arent just drinking the kool-aid dude ?

    Because it is inconceivable that a truly great fighter could have a list of unanswered questions hanging over his head that happens to be longer than his list of achievements?

    Give yourself an uppercut for being so naive, Pac is a terrific fighter, and likely a great guy, but when Bob Arum admitted that all of the people who paid to watch Pac fight Margarito Mosley and Marquez knew that those guys didnt stand a chance, and that Manny is an "entertainer", he (in order).....
    * looked you squarely in the eye
    * p1ssed in your pocket
    * told you that it was raining
    * laughed in your face

    FACT: Even my boy Carpentier was a better fighter than Pacquiao, and my boy Fitzy is hands down a level above him..... Burley was a much better fighter and he never won a title.

    You guys are nuts, and I dont give a fuk what ESPN, 60 minutes, fat old Merchant, blah, blah, says..... the old-time fighters are right, people are like parrots, and sheep, especially casual fans and idiots..... they all talked about Robinson being the best despite never having actually watched him fight because there was no footage available..... "oh, but saw it on, or I heard such-and-such say"..... , but never once bothering to compare him with Pep, who had a fkn phenomenal record early in his career and despite there being plenty of footage available.

    I know what I know, you sheep can think what you like, but your boy is over-rated and your mantra sucks.

    BTW, I still got your mojo from your fleeting appearance in the Pac-VQ thread
    ok ok ok pac aint good why the **** floyd needs some OSDT to fight him?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by horge View Post
      Just add different font types/sizes/colors and I'd take you for Horus.
      No idea what you said there.

      Was it relevant ?

      Most posters comment on what they agree/disagree with ?

      Comment


      • Originally posted by carts View Post
        ok ok ok pac aint good why the **** floyd needs some OSDT to fight him?
        1.) smarten up dumb-arse

        2.) read that entire post again

        3.) show me where I said that " pac aint that good "

        4.) give yourself an uppercut

        5.) go stand in the corner

        After you read my list, and considered your position, why did you post ?

        Stay away from me kid, or I will rip you a new one ^^

        Padded Pacquiao, and his team of Merry Men

        Why does Pacquiao need to use steroids ?

        Why cant he prove that he is clean, like any other athlete would ?

        Which one of those 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by horge View Post
          Just add different font types/sizes/colors and I'd take you for Horus.
          Getting back to you.....

          Did you actually have something relevant to say ?

          Or are you just one of the mindless trolls that frequent this site ?

          Apologies if I misunderstood your post, I dont know what it means, so I will assume that it was hostile, as-is usually the case after I post in a Pac thread

          Get back to me if I jumped to the wrong conclusion ^^

          If I was correct, point out anything in my post that you disagree with, especially anything that you consider to be factually incorrect.

          Debate involves logical discussion, your failure to point out any inaccuracies in my post likely confirms that I am 100% correct.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by LeadUppercut View Post
            ...
            I can always count on you doing your copy & paste routine and talking to yourself in threads that died days earlier. It's almost like internet necrophilia

            You really need some new hobbies. Seriously though, go outside and get some fresh air (Shower and shave first, no need to scare babies).

            Comment


            • Originally posted by ThePrince View Post
              I can always count on you doing your copy & paste routine and talking to yourself in threads that died days earlier. It's almost like internet necrophilia

              You really need some new hobbies. Seriously though, go outside and get some fresh air (Shower and shave first, no need to scare babies).

              Comment


              • Originally posted by ThePrince View Post
                I can always count on you doing your copy & paste routine and talking to yourself in threads that died days earlier. It's almost like internet necrophilia

                You really need some new hobbies. Seriously though, go outside and get some fresh air (Shower and shave first, no need to scare babies).
                Stop crying kid, and grow up.....

                Complete abject failure to point out an inconsistency or inaccuracy, is actually 100% agreement. Thanks for your support.

                Questions like.....

                * Could Pac have beaten Zahir Raheem, cuz he didnt?

                * Could Pac have beaten JMM in a rematch at 130, cuz he didnt want none?

                * Could Pac have beaten a top lightweight, cuz he didnt?

                * Could Pac have beaten a top jww, cuz he didnt?

                * Could Pac have beaten a prime Hoya, cuz he didnt?

                * Could Pac have beaten Hoya at 154, cuz he didnt?

                * Could Pac have beaten a prime Cotto, cuz he didnt?

                * Could Pac have beaten Cotto at 147, cuz he didnt?

                * Could Pac have beaten a prime Margarito, cuz he didnt?

                * Could Pac have beaten Margarito at 154, cuz he didnt?

                * Could Pac have beaten Margarito with 10oz gloves, cuz he didnt?

                * Could Pac have beaten a Clottey that fought back, cuz he didnt?

                * Could Pac have beaten a genuine jmw, cuz he didnt?

                * Could Pac have beaten a prime Mosley, cuz he didnt?

                * Could Pac have beaten a past-prime Mosley when he first had the chance back when Shane was ranked the #1 welter, cuz he didnt want none?

                * Could Pac have beaten Ortiz (a guy who laid hands on him in sparring - Roach named that session as "the best sparring ever", a guy who beat a fighter who Arum admitted was on Pac's own shortlist, and a guy who was ranked higher than any welter Pac has ever fought), cuz he didnt want none?

                * Could Pac beat JMM now at 140 (Pac's best weight, according to Manny), cuz he will not allow that to happen, 145lbs (a weight that Manny has never made himself ) was the deal-breaker? Fuk me, that is absurd.

                * Could Pac have beaten Martinez for that vacant WBC title, cuz he didnt?

                * Could Pac beat Martinez at 150 now ("I will fight anyone at 150" ~ Manny Pacquiao), cuz he dont want none? Pac? Manny? Where'd that guy go?

                * Could Pac beat Mayweather, cuz he hasnt?

                * Could Pac pass Olympic Style Drug Testing, cuz he dont want none?

                Jeez dude, that is one helluva shopping list full of unanswered questions about a supposedly great fighter

                I mean, that list is not complete either, **** we can go right back to fly, could Pac have beaten Too Sharp? Why didnt that fight happen, just like at lw, jww, and welter?

                WTF ?

                Surely that cant be right, because Pacquiao certainly had not achieved traditional greatness before the highly controversial win/loss to Marquez?

                Many fighters achieved greatness by fighting under the old divisional system, back when there was only one champion, using same day weigh-in's, and they did it by fighting as the smaller man..... Pacquiao has certainly never done anything like that.

                Are you sure that you arent just drinking the kool-aid dude ?

                Because it is inconceivable that a truly great fighter could have a list of unanswered questions hanging over his head that happens to be longer than his list of achievements?

                Give yourself an uppercut for being so naive, Pac is a terrific fighter, and likely a great guy, but when Bob Arum admitted that all of the people who paid to watch Pac fight Margarito Mosley and Marquez knew that those guys didnt stand a chance, and that Manny is an "entertainer", he (in order).....
                * looked you squarely in the eye
                * p1ssed in your pocket
                * told you that it was raining
                * laughed in your face

                FACT: Even my boy Carpentier was a better fighter than Pacquiao, and my boy Fitzy is hands down a level above him..... Burley was a much better fighter and he never won a title.

                You guys are nuts, and I dont give a fuk what ESPN, 60 minutes, fat old Merchant, blah, blah, says..... the old-time fighters are right, people are like parrots, and sheep, especially casual fans and idiots..... they all talked about Robinson being the best despite never having actually watched him fight because there was no footage available..... "oh, but saw it on, or I heard such-and-such say"..... , but never once bothering to compare him with Pep, who had a fkn phenomenal record early in his career and despite there being plenty of footage available.

                I know what I know, you sheep can think what you like, but your boy is over-rated and your mantra sucks.

                BTW, I still got your mojo from your fleeting appearance in the Pac-VQ thread

                Comment


                • Can you spot the difference ?

                  Whiney, non-boxing, fanboy, dribble.....

                  Originally posted by ThePrince View Post
                  I can always count on you doing your copy & paste routine and talking to yourself in threads that died days earlier. It's almost like internet necrophilia

                  You really need some new hobbies. Seriously though, go outside and get some fresh air (Shower and shave first, no need to scare babies).
                  Accurate, concise, knowledgeable, facts.....

                  Questions like.....

                  * Could Pac have beaten Zahir Raheem, cuz he didnt?

                  * Could Pac have beaten JMM in a rematch at 130, cuz he didnt want none?

                  * Could Pac have beaten a top lightweight, cuz he didnt?

                  * Could Pac have beaten a top jww, cuz he didnt?

                  * Could Pac have beaten a prime Hoya, cuz he didnt?

                  * Could Pac have beaten Hoya at 154, cuz he didnt?

                  * Could Pac have beaten a prime Cotto, cuz he didnt?

                  * Could Pac have beaten Cotto at 147, cuz he didnt?

                  * Could Pac have beaten a prime Margarito, cuz he didnt?

                  * Could Pac have beaten Margarito at 154, cuz he didnt?

                  * Could Pac have beaten Margarito with 10oz gloves, cuz he didnt?

                  * Could Pac have beaten a Clottey that fought back, cuz he didnt?

                  * Could Pac have beaten a genuine jmw, cuz he didnt?

                  * Could Pac have beaten a prime Mosley, cuz he didnt?

                  * Could Pac have beaten a past-prime Mosley when he first had the chance back when Shane was ranked the #1 welter, cuz he didnt want none?

                  * Could Pac have beaten Ortiz (a guy who laid hands on him in sparring - Roach named that session as "the best sparring ever", a guy who beat a fighter who Arum admitted was on Pac's own shortlist, and a guy who was ranked higher than any welter Pac has ever fought), cuz he didnt want none?

                  * Could Pac beat JMM now at 140 (Pac's best weight, according to Manny), cuz he will not allow that to happen, 145lbs (a weight that Manny has never made himself ) was the deal-breaker? Fuk me, that is absurd.

                  * Could Pac have beaten Martinez for that vacant WBC title, cuz he didnt?

                  * Could Pac beat Martinez at 150 now ("I will fight anyone at 150" ~ Manny Pacquiao), cuz he dont want none? Pac? Manny? Where'd that guy go?

                  * Could Pac beat Mayweather, cuz he hasnt?

                  * Could Pac pass Olympic Style Drug Testing, cuz he dont want none?

                  Jeez dude, that is one helluva shopping list full of unanswered questions about a supposedly great fighter

                  I mean, that list is not complete either, **** we can go right back to fly, could Pac have beaten Too Sharp? Why didnt that fight happen, just like at lw, jww, and welter?

                  WTF ?

                  Surely that cant be right, because Pacquiao certainly had not achieved traditional greatness before the highly controversial win/loss to Marquez?

                  Many fighters achieved greatness by fighting under the old divisional system, back when there was only one champion, using same day weigh-in's, and they did it by fighting as the smaller man..... Pacquiao has certainly never done anything like that.

                  Are you sure that you arent just drinking the kool-aid dude ?

                  Because it is inconceivable that a truly great fighter could have a list of unanswered questions hanging over his head that happens to be longer than his list of achievements?

                  Give yourself an uppercut for being so naive, Pac is a terrific fighter, and likely a great guy, but when Bob Arum admitted that all of the people who paid to watch Pac fight Margarito Mosley and Marquez knew that those guys didnt stand a chance, and that Manny is an "entertainer", he (in order).....
                  * looked you squarely in the eye
                  * p1ssed in your pocket
                  * told you that it was raining
                  * laughed in your face

                  FACT: Even my boy Carpentier was a better fighter than Pacquiao, and my boy Fitzy is hands down a level above him..... Burley was a much better fighter and he never won a title.

                  You guys are nuts, and I dont give a fuk what ESPN, 60 minutes, fat old Merchant, blah, blah, says..... the old-time fighters are right, people are like parrots, and sheep, especially casual fans and idiots..... they all talked about Robinson being the best despite never having actually watched him fight because there was no footage available..... "oh, but saw it on, or I heard such-and-such say"..... , but never once bothering to compare him with Pep, who had a fkn phenomenal record early in his career and despite there being plenty of footage available.

                  I know what I know, you sheep can think what you like, but your boy is over-rated and your mantra sucks.

                  BTW, I still got your mojo from your fleeting appearance in the Pac-VQ thread

                  Grow up fanboy.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by ThePrince View Post
                    I can always count on you doing your copy & paste routine and talking to yourself in threads that died days earlier. It's almost like internet necrophilia

                    You really need some new hobbies. Seriously though, go outside and get some fresh air (Shower and shave first, no need to scare babies).
                    uh oh its all copy pasted? i thought this idiot upper**** is a smart ass

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by carts View Post
                      ok ok ok pac aint good why the **** floyd needs some OSDT to fight him?
                      Cause if Pacquiao fails the test, it'll prove many things.

                      Would Pacquiao fight Floyd if Floyd failed the drug test?

                      No?

                      Why not?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP