Which did Bigger DAMAGE to Mayweather's legacy, the SUCKER PUNCH or...?

**pasawayako** · 10-12-2011, 10:34 PM

I think both are very damaging and could very well be remembered by the people if they're talking about floyd in the future.

**MOULINYAN KILLA** · 10-12-2011, 10:36 PM

Neither.

Now move along.

**Imatroll** · 10-12-2011, 10:37 PM

The suka punch y000

**carts** · 10-12-2011, 10:39 PM

people wont buy his **** anymore

**Toby 1991** · 10-13-2011, 01:39 AM

I would say the sucker punches.

**KING MEAT** · 10-13-2011, 01:41 AM

Neither.

Now move along.

**badboypeenoy** · 10-13-2011, 05:44 AM

I would have added ducking Pacquiao on the choices. But I'd say the sucker punch. At least with Marquez he had an excuse. He was coming back from his long vacation. So he had to force a lightweight to fight at a higher weight then just to make sure he gets maximum advantage, cheat the poor Mexican on the scales.

**Rip Chudd** · 10-13-2011, 05:46 AM

Neither.
Now move along.

**hugh grant** · 10-13-2011, 06:02 AM

Originally posted by dj Benze

Neither.

Now move along.

Originally posted by KING MEAT

Neither.

Now move along.

Originally posted by Rip Chudd

Neither.
Now move along.

So you think it is the ducking and retiring and reluctance to fight top fighters that will hurt his legacy more, and there is not a vote option for that?

Which did Bigger DAMAGE to Mayweather's legacy, the SUCKER PUNCH or...?