The confusion when comparing Hopkins, Jones and Calzaghe

[SirTomJones]

all 3 picked on bums

[edgarg]

Jones was the most gifted. Hopkins owns the best legacy. Calzaghe was never defeated.

Jones was the biggest star and spent the most time on top. Calzaghe retired undefeated on top. Hopkins is still on top.

Jones beat Hop. Hop beat Jones. Zags beat both Hop and Jones but some say that Hop beat Zags.

Ultimately who does history give the nod to?

Anyone who says Hopkins beat Calzaghe just doesn't know what he's looking at. Calzaghe made an utter fool of Hopkins and beat him easily. The only other farce was the "split" decision, which was too ridiculous to take seriously.

[ИATAS]

Anyone who says Hopkins beat Calzaghe just doesn't know what he's looking at. Calzaghe made an utter fool of Hopkins and beat him easily. The only other farce was the "split" decision, which was too ridiculous to take seriously.

getting knocked down in the first round and missing all 10 punch combo's in a row made hopkins look foolish? TBH neither fighter came out that fight looking very good. Hopkins gassed the 2nd half of the fight and looked his age and joe looked sloppy as hell.

[IMG]http://i28.***********.com/albums/c217/natas206/hopcalz-1.gif[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i28.***********.com/albums/c217/natas206/hopcalz2.gif[/IMG]