Vyacheslav Glazkov vs. Samuel Peter on the Lebedev-Toney card

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Hammer
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 50797
    • 3,416
    • 8,704
    • 58,851

    #1

    Vyacheslav Glazkov vs. Samuel Peter on the Lebedev-Toney card

    Although he's lost to top heavyweights, I think Sam Peter is a dangerous opponent for the inexperienced Vyacheslav Glazkov (9-0).
  • The Hammer
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 50797
    • 3,416
    • 8,704
    • 58,851

    #2
    Glazkov has been inactive since his fight with Bahktov.

    He hasn't been injured - his promoter has just been slow to get him fights.

    Comment

    • Sparked_1985
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jan 2009
      • 7250
      • 226
      • 71
      • 14,112

      #3
      Peter needs someone to tell him to pack it in.

      He's been taken some punishment.

      Comment

      • The Hammer
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 50797
        • 3,416
        • 8,704
        • 58,851

        #4
        Originally posted by Sparked_1985
        Peter needs someone to tell him to pack it in.

        He's been taken some punishment.
        Sam is still young, just age 31. He's far from being a shot fighter and Glazkov isn't a big puncher anyway.

        Comment

        • Sparked_1985
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jan 2009
          • 7250
          • 226
          • 71
          • 14,112

          #5
          Originally posted by Freedom.
          Sam is still young, just age 31. He's far from being a shot fighter and Glazkov isn't a big puncher anyway.
          I don't think he was very good to begin with.

          I would pick with straight face pick the most of the guys who competed in the 168-pound super 6 to beat him.

          Comment

          • Russian Crushin
            atheist with a gun
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2009
            • 33788
            • 1,472
            • 836
            • 46,625

            #6
            Peters needs to retire

            I wouldnt be suprised if he came in at like 280

            Comment

            • The Hammer
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 50797
              • 3,416
              • 8,704
              • 58,851

              #7
              Originally posted by Sparked_1985
              I don't think he was very good to begin with.

              I would pick with straight face pick the most of the guys who competed in the 168-pound super 6 to beat him.
              Sam Peter is not that bad. He's a former WBC HW champion and has had some impressive performances over the years.

              Comment

              • Spray_resistant
                Vacant interim regular(C)
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 29758
                • 3,027
                • 1,592
                • 53,384

                #8
                Originally posted by Freedom.
                Although he's lost to top heavyweights, I think Sam Peter is a dangerous opponent for the inexperienced Vyacheslav Glazkov (9-0).
                An inshape Peter is dangerous, he has only lost to some of the best in the division and 3 of his 5 losses are against the absolute best.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP