the people who said PBF and Khan are ******...i mean using maywather logic---there's already a blue print to beat Khan while Bradley is undefeated...dumb pigeons.
more credible fight? khan v pbf or pac v brad
Collapse
-
Khan vs PBF becuz Khan has a stylistic advantage over PBF (yeah I'm using that again dorks) as well as being BIGGER, FAST, ATHLETIC, and IN HIS PRIME...
I've already explained that Bradley has nothing but disadvanteges against Pac, so there's no argument
And lets not forget this fact, KHAN > BRADLEY (and I like Bradley better)Comment
-
This was just an awkward comment... I don't even know how to criticize it... But its definitely bad
Basically ur saying Mayweather logic is ridiculous, while simultaneously using it to prove us wrong... That's just gross, I puke thinking about itComment
-
Both are good fights. Kahn in my opinion is the best at 140 but it doesnt mean that imma discredit Pac vs Bradley becuz of it.
Also, Bradley isnt Floyds leftovers so hopefully when Floyd gets asked the question about Pacquiao, that leftovers NON-SENSE can finally go away!Comment
-
Does Pac even need a blueprint to beat his opponents?
Bring some slow, come forward guy into his ring, and he's automatically a punching bag.Comment
-
I would probably go with the Floyd logic and say Bradley since he's never lost and there's no formula to beat him. Lol.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
I gotta disagree. Bradley has decent defense but he is too offensive minded to avoid hard shots from Pac and we know he doesn't have the power to hurt Manny. That spells disaster I'm afraid.
P.S. I'm not a Pac fanatic as you may think by the avitar and you forgot that Manny did knock out Cotto.Comment
Comment