Intense staredown Cotto-Margarito final press conf

[Mr. Fantastic]

TBH....how many Toney fans are on this site....becuz I genuinely haven't seen any........

Furthemore, it shouldn't matter that he didnt actually cheat, it may be a cop out, but I would rather have someone take steroids to beat me than to have hardened wraps to beat me.....its the intention to cheat.....I just dont understand why you are so quick to call out other posters for supporting cheaters......cuz it just goes around in cirles.....you call out other posters on their double standards...but by doing so you are creating a double standard for yourself.....if should be fair game for others to support cheaters if you do.......

There is several. Maybe because you don't go to threads that have his name on there.

I already told you moron, I call them out for calling someone "Margacheto" when they support one themselves. No matter if one case is worse than the other.

[Mojita]

Yawn. Same usual names and BS said in these threads.

[-KPB-]

There is several. Maybe because you don't go to threads that have his name on there.

I already told you moron, I call them out for calling someone "Margacheto" when they support one themselves. No matter if one case is worse than the other.

And you just called someone out who didnt even mention "margacheato" in his post...so who is really the moron.....nor am I a nuthugger of a cheater......

[Nuurzhaelan]

Double standards on their part that I'm calling them on. I know Tony ****ed up, I don't deny that. See the thing is that most of these guys being fanatical about Mosley and Toney start calling someone like Margarito "Margacheato" when they themselves support one. Their cop out is that it's a different type of cheat. Also, Margarito didn't use the plaster in a fight, unless proven otherwise. Them 2 however cheated in a fight.

I know what you mean there, but let's be clear. We cannot 'prove' that he used the plaster in the Cotto fight and we cannot prove he did not, but we can damned well speculate; and whether or not we can prove it is immaterial because that cannot alter whether or not he actually used plaster (or some other illegal substance to improve his punching power) in the Cotto fight. It merely means that we simply do not know with any certainty. For my part, I think the evidence is clear and you're in denial.

A negative cannot be proven, at least not without knowing every particular surrounding the whole event. It is impossible. That is why the burden of proof is usually on the accuser, but there is evidence to support the allegation and arguments to the contrary of there being evidence make you look like an apologist.

[gayfish]

dont mind chicano hes just scared for margaritos eye getting ***ed up...

[Abraham Reyes]

mrs.***tastic has the worst logic and common sense but you really can't blame him he is only just a mexi****, so please don't be too angry with him it's not his fault.

[Mr. Fantastic]

And you just called someone out who didnt even mention "margacheato" in his post...so who is really the moron.....nor am I a nuthugger of a cheater......

You actually. Also, I wasn't talking to you and like every thread I post, you seem to follow me like you have some infatuation.

I know what you mean there, but let's be clear. We cannot 'prove' that he used the plaster in the Cotto fight and we cannot prove he did not, but we can damned well speculate; and whether or not we can prove it is immaterial because that cannot alter whether or not he actually used plaster (or some other illegal substance to improve his punching power) in the Cotto fight. It merely means that we simply do not know with any certainty. For my part, I think the evidence is clear and you're in denial.

A negative cannot be proven, at least not without knowing every particular surrounding the whole event. It is impossible. That is why the burden of proof is usually on the accuser, but there is evidence to support the allegation and arguments to the contrary of there being evidence make you look like an apologist.

I'm not in denial. There is certain levels of common sense. Nothing wrong with doubting that he "may" of cheated vs Cotto. But to say like it's a fact man with no proof is just ridiculous. It's mostly Cotto fans doing all the *****ing to be honest.

I could say, Cotto got hit so much by the 8th, body shots, weakness vs uppercuts and many other things to prove my common sense theory. No wrong with that common sense either.

The only fact and proof is that he tried to cheat and got suspended for it. That's it.

[Mr. Fantastic]

mrs.***tastic has the worst logic and common sense but you really can't blame him he is only just a mexi****, so please don't be too angry with him it's not his fault.

Look at this idiot talking about logic and common sense.

[gayfish]

Look at this idiot talking about logic and common sense.

educate yourself. accept the fact that margarito loaded his gloves against cotto.

[Champ Is Here]

Staredown was not all that son