I was watching this fight the other day and it just seemed like Ramirez was supposed to loose that fight at all costs.
In that fight...
Ramirez was the boxer that needed the distance and mancini the brawler.
1) The ring was a 16footer favoring mancini
2) They didnt put any Rosin on the canvas, Leather shoes wouldnt grip, I.e. no power (Ramirez wore leather, Mancini wore rubber)
3) The Fight was in Ohio - Mancini's home town
4) All the judges were from Ohio
What do you guys think shady situation?
In that fight...
Ramirez was the boxer that needed the distance and mancini the brawler.
1) The ring was a 16footer favoring mancini
2) They didnt put any Rosin on the canvas, Leather shoes wouldnt grip, I.e. no power (Ramirez wore leather, Mancini wore rubber)
3) The Fight was in Ohio - Mancini's home town
4) All the judges were from Ohio
What do you guys think shady situation?
Gran Campeon