Which was more impressive and dominant? Who is the better fighter Adamek or Ortiz? Which one has more heart and intelligence.
More Impressive: Vitali Beating Adamek, Floyd Beating Ortiz
Collapse
-
-
-
Yeah, which fighter was more dominant and impressive in their win. I mean granted Vitali was fighting a 2 division champ who was ranked number 3 in the division and Floyd was fighting someone who won a token and had a year ago quit in a fight because he didnt like to be hit, but try to throw that out, who was more dominant and impressive?Comment
-
Ortiz has the IQ of a 5 year old but physically a very strong 164 lb Welterweight.
Adamek is more intelligent and the better warrior, but physically he is the worst heavyweight of all time. Hes a slow bloated cruiserweight with no power. Struggled against bums 10 years past their prime in Grant, Mcbride.Comment
-
Of all time? You realize PHYSICALLY he is on par with the absolute best heavyweights of al ltime, right? The guys who barely weigehd over 200lbs. Get real.Ortiz has the IQ of a 5 year old but physically a very strong 164 lb Welterweight.
Adamek is more intelligent and the better warrior, but physically he is the worst heavyweight of all time. Hes a slow bloated cruiserweight with no power. Struggled against bums 10 years past their prime in Grant, Mcbride.Comment
-
Vitali would never sucker punch an opponent.
That something only low-lifes like James Butler and Floyd Mayweather do.Comment
-
Comment
-
This is a pick em question. Adamek wasn't physically capable of competing with Vitali, but he was a smart fighter and good opponent.
Ortiz wasn't mentally capable of competing with Mayweather, but he was a big fighter and good opponent.
I'd say the Adamek fight was for impressive, because Vitali wasn't bothered even once, and completely deconstructed Adamek in that fight. It's very close though.Comment
-
Floyd beating man 14 pounds bigger and 10 pounds younger..whats impressive bout Vitali beating up a man 4 inches shorter and 30 pounds lighterComment
Comment