Tweet
khan is number 1 on the ring , espn, boxrec, thats enough for me.
-
-
Irrelevant though right?
As long as he has issues to deal with should he not just stay quiet and deal with his problems? If he can fight Morales, regardless of the WBC strap, is he not free to fight Khan? He certainly was quick to take Morales on a weeks notice.
Khan is on the radar is also a BS line just to get people off his back. If he's on the radar, go fight him mo****er. Why not fight the dude you consider the second best after you? And dont give me no contract issue BS. He's willing to fight Morales, so that chucks that excuse out the window.Comment
-
Here we go. Everyone is talking about Bradley/Morales/Khan and this fool comes out of the wood work talking about Mayweather. I hope everyone sees who the real *****'s are because not once did I mention Pac or Floyd. That's exactly what I am talking about. People ask me "Grustler, why are you so involved in the whole Pac/Floyd debate"? It's because no matter what I or anyone post about what or which fighter on boxing scene. Floyd and Pac names will come up because those are the only two names casuals fans get in an uproar about. I'm not even going to entertain this reply but rather wanted to point out to people what a real ***** posts like.Comment
-
Bradley is a clubfighter and a bum.
Everyone but banana boy know this nao.
Comment
-
Oh, now your trying to call me out for being a Floyd fan? Another one who mentions Floyd before I do and have the nerve to say I'm all into Floyd? Bradley said he was not interested in fighting Khan correct? Did the fight happen?..... NO! because he is in legal troubles right? Ok, fair enough. Then why call out Erik Morales? Just because he is fighting for the belt Bradley got stripped for, for NOT fighting Khan? what part of the game is that? Yeah, I understand that he wants to get his paper right and left his promoters for bigger opportunities but now that it looks like he is getting it. He calls out Erik Morales just because Morales might win his title? I thought Bradley was looking for bigger fish and that he accomplished everything at 140 already? why fight for a title you already held and got stripped for? Fight the man at 140 which is Khan for the whole ball of wax.Comment
-
Am I wrong, or did Bradley say he had no more business at 140? Why is he targeting Morales then?Comment
-
Bradley had the belt and didn't fight Khan and now that he got the title stripped he is going to fight for the same belt and not fight Khan because he is looking to fight the bigger fish according to him. Maybe if Bradley would have kept his mouth shut then nobody would be saying anything about what he said regarding Khan. Homie put his foot in his mouth. I was one of the people who thought Bradley could beat Khan but looks like Bradley is looking to fight Morales to get his title back and then try to leap past Khan. It's as plain as day.Last edited by GRUSTLER; 09-17-2011, 12:08 PM.Comment
-
Me and you both know that's not how super fights are made grus..Alexander Bradley had the chance to be something big but it was rushed and look what happened..I don't see nothing wrong with Bradley going to get his belt back and us seeing what happens next from there..But jumping the gun is not right or fair bro..Esp when Khan fought Salita Paulie M and Mcflurry in his last four fights..Only one fighter who was top 5 I might add..Let's look at Bradley's last four fights shall we,Alexander Peterson and Holt two top ranked fighters(meaning in top 5)and one very hard fight in Peterson..Let's not act as if Bradley was running around here not testing himself..
BTW I was not trying to knock you grus for being a May fan I don't care you good peoples in my book bro..Just wanted to point out that all fighters contradict them selfs..Comment
Comment