Comments Thread For: Top Rank Pres Discusses Pay-Per-View Undercards

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Top Rank Pres Discusses Pay-Per-View Undercards

    With the fall schedule fast approaching, Top Rank has two major PPV shows, one on Nov. 12 (Manny Pacquiao-Juan Manual Marquez 3) and one on Dec. 3 (Antonio Margarito-Miguel Cotto 2).

    [Click Here To Read More]
  • ShoulderRoll
    Join The Great Resist
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 56195
    • 10,142
    • 5,032
    • 763,445

    #2
    Translation: Golden Boy's undercards are putting ours to shame and we better step our game up.

    Comment

    • spoonwars
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 2635
      • 151
      • 69
      • 8,813

      #3
      Top Rank, please put a damn good undercard this time.

      Comment

      • Ringlife
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jun 2011
        • 5861
        • 64
        • 49
        • 12,524

        #4
        Top rank is losing the battle with Golden boy on the under cards and the main events. Their fighters are getting old and they're losing the good fighters to Golden Boy. Bob Arum will be the new Don King LOl So move over. Golden Boy Has Money ,Canelo ,Khan ,B hop. Top Rank you're slipping hard.

        Comment

        • komandante
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2008
          • 3579
          • 184
          • 14
          • 24,294

          #5
          GBP is bankrupt and Top Rank has the best fighters of today. Mayweather v Ortiz looks to me is an undercard for Pac v Marquez...

          Comment

          • UglyPug
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jun 2010
            • 9561
            • 403
            • 159
            • 13,951

            #6
            the undercard for mayweather-ortiz sucks - it WAS a great undercard before matthyssee pulled out and morales got a gimme opponent for the belt. . .

            Comment

            • UglyPug
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jun 2010
              • 9561
              • 403
              • 159
              • 13,951

              #7
              if cotto/margarito really ends up with rigo/rico and wolak/vanes or wolak/rodriguez II - that will be an amazing undercard. to be honest, i haven't seen that many good undercards in a while. there should be three main elements for undercards: quality of fighters and name value; significance (i.e. what's at stake? and entertainment. the first two can be dictated, whereas entertainment can't.

              Comment

              • delpilar
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Jun 2011
                • 647
                • 18
                • 1
                • 6,748

                #8
                Boring Floyd needs two Mexican superstars to sell his bore.

                Comment

                • apunchnotseen
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 564
                  • 16
                  • 0
                  • 6,616

                  #9
                  I love(or love to hate) boxers that spew crap and name names, providing they don't back down if one of those names step to the plate. Ricardo Mayorga has earned every check he's cashed. Then there is Vanes, who is a habitual *****. How do you repeatedly walk away from fights people want to see? If he's half as good as he thinks he is Lara and Angulo should've been tune ups.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP