Tweet
it doesnt matter if he fought cotto/margarito then or now. excuses will still be made as to why he won. thats what frustrates me about this. the man goes in does what he supposed to do as a fighter. and this is to outhink your opponent and win. remember the man is undefeated. why are so many people blaming him for the fact that his opponents couldnt beat him. he didnt fight those fights by himself. so why crap on him cause his opponents failed to do their job? it makes no since to hate this man so much
and why is it that fighters are cherry picked and over the hill once floyd fights and beats them. everybody said de la hoya was too big for floyd and he will knock him out. floyd beats him and all of a sudden he's over the hill. he wasnt over the hill when he knocked mayorga out was he. and lets talk about hatton. he was undefeated in his prime and many thought he was the one to take floyd's "0". he knocks him out and now all of a sudden he's no more good.
and lastly mosley. he came off a very career defining win by being the only man to knock out antonio margarito. and before that he knocked out mayorga. so shane proved that he still had what it takes to be at the top. he gets in with floyd and he actually hurts him a couple of times. floyd adjust's and takes over the fight. shane doesnt have the desire to fight anymore so floyd takes the win. is that floyd's fault? then here come the excuses again.
my point is why is there always have to be an excuse when floyd beats his opponents. why cant it be that the man is just a good fighter. its impossible to go in there and take fighters out of their comfort zones and dominate them unless you are a good fighter. and watch what happens when he beats ortiz. same thing.
for years you haters have criticized floyd for fighting old smaller guys. now he has a man 2 years his junior, a southpaw, and bigger. but like the other victims excuses wil be said about this victory as well. its sad but true.
and why is it that fighters are cherry picked and over the hill once floyd fights and beats them. everybody said de la hoya was too big for floyd and he will knock him out. floyd beats him and all of a sudden he's over the hill. he wasnt over the hill when he knocked mayorga out was he. and lets talk about hatton. he was undefeated in his prime and many thought he was the one to take floyd's "0". he knocks him out and now all of a sudden he's no more good.
and lastly mosley. he came off a very career defining win by being the only man to knock out antonio margarito. and before that he knocked out mayorga. so shane proved that he still had what it takes to be at the top. he gets in with floyd and he actually hurts him a couple of times. floyd adjust's and takes over the fight. shane doesnt have the desire to fight anymore so floyd takes the win. is that floyd's fault? then here come the excuses again.
my point is why is there always have to be an excuse when floyd beats his opponents. why cant it be that the man is just a good fighter. its impossible to go in there and take fighters out of their comfort zones and dominate them unless you are a good fighter. and watch what happens when he beats ortiz. same thing.
for years you haters have criticized floyd for fighting old smaller guys. now he has a man 2 years his junior, a southpaw, and bigger. but like the other victims excuses wil be said about this victory as well. its sad but true.
Comment