Best Boxers of All Time, by Division (LIST)

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ROSTAM
    Banned
    • Sep 2011
    • 323
    • 54
    • 15
    • 801

    #11
    Chavez the best 140 pounder? LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

    Comment

    • Tiozzo
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2007
      • 6234
      • 278
      • 330
      • 6,886

      #12
      Originally posted by Medved
      Half those guys would get destroyed by Todays champs.

      Better Training
      Better Technique
      More Competition creating the best (most bums get filtered thru Amateur system)
      Less corruption.

      Having Ali, Pep , Charles, Greb, Pep is a complete joke.

      If you put in today's big dogs or the ones in last 10 years with them, they would get owned twice over.

      Simple math and simple SPORTS Evolution. Boxing is only sport in history where the old geezers seem to think that Evolution doesnt effect it and some guy who fought 400 times in 1920 was some magical fighter when there were 1000x less Boxers in the world meaning less competition and lower level of competition.
      what a terrible, ignorant post

      go on, name half of those fighters who would get beat right now, and who they would get beat by

      Comment

      • bobo_bobo
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Apr 2008
        • 228
        • 6
        • 2
        • 6,952

        #13
        Originally posted by Medved
        Half those guys would get destroyed by Todays champs.

        Better Training
        Better Technique
        More Competition creating the best (most bums get filtered thru Amateur system)
        Less corruption.

        Having Ali, Pep , Charles, Greb, Pep is a complete joke.

        If you put in today's big dogs or the ones in last 10 years with them, they would get owned twice over.

        Simple math and simple SPORTS Evolution. Boxing is only sport in history where the old geezers seem to think that Evolution doesnt effect it and some guy who fought 400 times in 1920 was some magical fighter when there were 1000x less Boxers in the world meaning less competition and lower level of competition.
        I agree with you. Lets look at other sports like tack and field and swimming. Do you think it was possible for some one in the 1920's, 1930,s 1940's, to beat today's champions like Usain Bolt and Michael Phelps? What about golf Tiger Woods or tennis Roger Federer. As the level of competition increases so does the performances of the athletes.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP