If you look back at Paul Williams career thus far, he's recieved the benefit of the doubt a lot. I think there are at least 3 fights where he should've lost that he got a decision for. What's fishy is that not only did Williams win these fights, but the scorecards are unbelievable.
Williams vs. Martinez 1 - Most everyone thought this was a close fight that Williams MAY have won. I personally thought Martinez did much more damage and landed the cleaner more effective shots and exposed the fact that Paul is an arm puncher who just piles up landed shots that don't do much damage.
The scorecards - 115-113, 114-114, and a ridiculous 119-110.
I personally had Martinez winning by 2 or 3 rounds. Somehow this Fight of the Year candidate was a near shutout for one moronic judge.
Williams vs. Cintron - This fight was a disgrace for multiple reasons. Most are happy that Cintron lost because of the falling out of the ring incident. However, I can't ignore the fact that Cintron should've gotten the decision here. Cintron was landing the big shots and cleaner shots. He also hurt Paul a few times and was never hurt by a punch.
The scorecards - 40-36, 39-37, and 36-40.
I personally had it 3 to 1 for Cintron, but I could see giving all rounds to Cintron. Yet again, a judge apparently thought Williams swept the fight and gave a 40-36 scorecard for Paul.
Williams vs. Lara - In Paul's most recent and most ridiculous decision win to date, he was thoroughly beat by Lara. He was bloodied, battered, and thoroughly defeated.
The scorecards - 116-114, 115-114, and 114-114. Not one judge scored for Lara even though everyone else in the world knew he won easily. HBO scored it 117-110 in Lara's favor. When there is that large of a discrepency between the judges and the masses, something is wrong. Either these judges are not qualified, or they're getting a payoff.
Is Williams' habit of getting these "gifts" attributed to his pitty-pat punches and high activity, or is there something else going on here?
Williams vs. Martinez 1 - Most everyone thought this was a close fight that Williams MAY have won. I personally thought Martinez did much more damage and landed the cleaner more effective shots and exposed the fact that Paul is an arm puncher who just piles up landed shots that don't do much damage.
The scorecards - 115-113, 114-114, and a ridiculous 119-110.
I personally had Martinez winning by 2 or 3 rounds. Somehow this Fight of the Year candidate was a near shutout for one moronic judge.
Williams vs. Cintron - This fight was a disgrace for multiple reasons. Most are happy that Cintron lost because of the falling out of the ring incident. However, I can't ignore the fact that Cintron should've gotten the decision here. Cintron was landing the big shots and cleaner shots. He also hurt Paul a few times and was never hurt by a punch.
The scorecards - 40-36, 39-37, and 36-40.
I personally had it 3 to 1 for Cintron, but I could see giving all rounds to Cintron. Yet again, a judge apparently thought Williams swept the fight and gave a 40-36 scorecard for Paul.
Williams vs. Lara - In Paul's most recent and most ridiculous decision win to date, he was thoroughly beat by Lara. He was bloodied, battered, and thoroughly defeated.
The scorecards - 116-114, 115-114, and 114-114. Not one judge scored for Lara even though everyone else in the world knew he won easily. HBO scored it 117-110 in Lara's favor. When there is that large of a discrepency between the judges and the masses, something is wrong. Either these judges are not qualified, or they're getting a payoff.
Is Williams' habit of getting these "gifts" attributed to his pitty-pat punches and high activity, or is there something else going on here?
Comment