Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Established figheters like Pacquiao dont want to give young fighters a shot -Guerrero

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by puga View Post
    marquez cannto beta margo or shane but he did something niether of those guys were not able to do which is give pac a lot of trouble and that becasue due to his style...you think guerrero can do anything similar to that?...please..if pac was fighting guerero he'd be crucified...... and no, guerrero cant fight the best if he keeps fighting old and shot fighters himself...he needs to earn the chance to be in there with pac...so far, he has'nt done that.....berto is irellevant now, bradley is missing in action and jones ?..shane was ranked higher than him, prolly higher even now......
    Yeah, he gave Pacman trouble when he was younger. The Marquez that gave Pacman trouble has past long ago. The Marquez of now was hurt by Katsidis. Berto is irrelivant now, but he wasn't when Pacman was fighting Shane, now was he? Because of that Floyd is fixin to show up Pacman yet again by fighting another high ranked fighter while Pacman gives us more of the same, which is beating on another near 40 year old far past it.

    Comment


    • #42
      Guerrero said the truth about Pac why is everybody butthurt

      Comment


      • #43
        Manny looks for opponents at the retirement homes.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
          Yeah, he gave Pacman trouble when he was younger. The Marquez that gave Pacman trouble has past long ago. The Marquez of now was hurt by Katsidis. Berto is irrelivant now, but he wasn't when Pacman was fighting Shane, now was he? Because of that Floyd is fixin to show up Pacman yet again by fighting another high ranked fighter while Pacman gives us more of the same, which is beating on another near 40 year old far past it.
          what makes you think he wont now?....it was his style that gave pac trouble not his physical attributes.....actually moneywise, shane made mor esense than berto..and caliber wise, shane is levels above berto.....****... it is more likely that, jmm has more chance at beating pac than ortiz has at beating floyd......

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by puga View Post
            what makes you think he wont now?....it was his style that gave pac trouble not his physical attributes.....actually moneywise, shane made mor esense than berto..and caliber wise, shane is levels above berto.....****... it is more likely that, jmm has more chance at beating pac than ortiz has at beating floyd......
            His style at 130 & below. But Marquez was proven worthless at welterweight already. Shane was levels above Berto when he was in his prime, but the Shane that got his a$$ kicked by Floyd, drew with Mora & spanked by Pacman cannot beat Berto.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
              His style at 130 & below. But Marquez was proven worthless at welterweight already. Shane was levels above Berto when he was in his prime, but the Shane that got his a$$ kicked by Floyd, drew with Mora & spanked by Pacman cannot beat Berto.
              lol...so marquez style changed when he fought from 130 to when he fought above that?...thats the most ridiculous thing ive heard in a while....he was proven worthless against a huge guy, yes.....floyd aint excatly andrea berto man, so shane losing to him does not , in no way shape or form, mean he is shot,... him drawing againts defensive bigger fighter mean he aint **** either, it just means he struggles vs that style.....shane cannot beat berto?...how do you know that?....

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by puga View Post
                lol...so marquez style changed when he fought from 130 to when he fought above that?...thats the most ridiculous thing ive heard in a while....he was proven worthless against a huge guy, yes.....floyd aint excatly andrea berto man, so shane losing to him does not , in no way shape or form, mean he is shot,... him drawing againts defensive bigger fighter mean he aint **** either, it just means he struggles vs that style.....shane cannot beat berto?...how do you know that?....
                How do you know Shane is levels above Berto? Berto is younger & has more to give. Shane is punch drunk & looked like **** 3 times in a row.

                I never said Marquez's style has changed above 130. You said that. He's older now & has been hurt in every fight he's had at 135. He was beaten for 3 minutes of every round against Floyd. He's too small for that weight, & almost 40. Shane is shot, period. I bet you think that the Shane that fought Oscar in 2000 would be beaten like the Shane of 2011 was, your crazy. Your just butthurt that a boxing reporter called out Pacman for visiting the retirment homes for his next opponents. Ghost simply agreed with the man.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by LegendOfLink View Post
                  Guerrero keeps beating up washed up fighters, but thinks he deserves a shot at Pacquiao? And he pulled out of the Maidana fight with a questionable injury, did they even verify anything is wrong with his shoulder other than him just saying somethings wrong with it?

                  The more Guerrero talks, the more I hate him. He feels fighters should be given fights and not have to earn them.


                  Edit: Does anyone even think Guerrero would last 3 rounds against great fighters like Pacquiao or Floyd? I don't, he didn't even get in the ring against Maidana who probably would have beaten him. Maidana beat a better boxer in Ortiz and had a war with Khan and Kotenlik.

                  What has Guerrero done, beaten up left-overs like Katsidis and Casamayor when other fighters have beaten them better than he has.

                  You know what I think is bull****? Fighters who think they should get big pay-days without having to earn it the hard-way.
                  He was asked about it and he gave his opinion nothing wrong with that. would you rather he say ummmm i don kno talk to my promoter

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
                    How do you know Shane is levels above Berto? Berto is younger & has more to give. Shane is punch drunk & looked like **** 3 times in a row. I never said Marquez's style has changed above 130. You said that. He's older now & has been hurt in every fight he's had at 135. He was beaten for 3 minutes of every round against Floyd. He's too small for that weight, & almost 40. Shane is shot, period. I bet you think that the Shane that fought Oscar in 2000 would be beaten like the Shane of 2011 was, your crazy. Your just butthurt that a boxing reporter called out Pacman for visiting the retirment homes for his next opponents. Ghost simply agreed with the man.
                    how do i know shane is better than berto even at this point?..becuase he lasted vs pac and floyd..., something i doubt berto would be able to do esp vs pacman....jmm was too small for floyd, not for pacman, they are very similar in size...when i said it was jmm style that gave pac trouble not his physical attributes, you said his style at 130 &below, meaning you implied that jmm's style above 130 and below is diffrent than above130.... and no, i just dont like the hypocites, the under achivers talking like they better, the buthurt people jealous of pacs success.....and youre just ****ring guerrero's quittin ass coz he's taking a shot at pac.........

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by puga View Post
                      how do i know shane is better than berto even at this point?..becuase he lasted vs pac and floyd..., something i doubt berto would be able to do esp vs pacman....jmm was too small for floyd, not for pacman, they are very similar in size...when i said it was jmm style that gave pac trouble not his physical attributes, you said his style at 130 &below, meaning you implied that jmm's style above 130 and below is diffrent than above130.... and no, i just dont like the hypocites, the under achivers talking like they better, the buthurt people jealous of pacs success.....and youre just ****ring guerrero's quittin ass coz he's taking a shot at pac.........
                      Watch the interview boy. He didn't take a shot at Pacman. He actually took a shot at Marquez. Everything he said was true & it bothers you that it is. But boxing fans are waking up. If anyone is jealus of success based on lies, it ain't me. The last time Pacman & Marquez fought was at 130. That;'s why I mentioned it. Not because I believe his style has changed like you claim. I already told you that. Marquez is slipping now. He's been hurt by lightweights. That means he'll be hurt more by welterweights. But if Marquez & Pacman are the same size, why do they fight 2 weight classes apart then?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP