Comments Thread For: Floyd Mayweather's Team Respond To Deposition Claims
Collapse
-
What's school is this, Littlemac? You couldn't even come up with a reply bro. It's all good if you can't have an intelligent coversation.
You can test your knowledge with the lower tier posters on this. But, my question wasn't even about knowledge it was just common sense. And, you couldn't even answer it. You had to troll. Which is fine bro.
But, if anyone who can ACTUALLY discuss boxing. Is more than welcome to answer my question.
"Who Necks"
-Samuel Peter
Comment
-
So, Manny is a " proud man " huh ?Anyone that knows about the life and career of manny pacquiao will know how much of a proud man he is and where he has come from he's had to fight his whole life to get this far and then be branded a cheat with no evidence at all to back it up is disgracefull and floyd should be brought to account this be forced to retract his false allegations. Innocent until proven guilty...
Too proud to take a harmless little blood test.
Fair enough.
But, just wondering.....
How is Manny's pride looking now that most people think he is a steroid cheat because he refused to undertake random blood tests ?Comment
-
And, while we are on the subject of " pride ", bump.........Comment
-
Comment
-
What's school is this, Littlemac? You couldn't even come up with a reply bro. It's all good if you can't have an intelligent coversation.
You can test your knowledge with the lower tier posters on this. But, my question wasn't even about knowledge it was just common sense. And, you couldn't even answer it. You had to troll. Which is fine bro.
But, if anyone who can ACTUALLY discuss boxing. Is more than welcome to answer my question.
"Who Necks"
-Samuel Peter

I aint your bro lol...You don't even know me. Anyway...your the one asking me how I would really know if Holyfield was clean. Well He was willing to take the test. He took it and was clean so my logic points that he was clean for that fight by his actions and reactions to the issue and you then ask me if I really know truely if his clean. Well I didn't conduct the test my self, but based on what happen I believe he was clean.
The reply I gave you was a mock of what you were asking me. You were slow on the up take. I figured you would have caught on, but I had over estimated you.Comment
-
ThePrince is the worst.
I cant believe how the guy is fixated with that ridiculous " lawsuit ".
It simply MUST proceed, it is far more important than the fight, and Pacquiao MUST be vindicated. What a bunch of crybaby little girls.
Pac dont want to fight, that is plainly obvious. Mosley landed a fight with Mayweather, and that is after Pac ducked him..... Ortiz landed a fight with Mayweather, and that is after Pac ducked him as well.
It is only Pacquiao that cant seem to land a Mayweather fight, and we all know why that is.Comment
-
Nah man, they have night-court in the US. But either way, they gave him plenty of options. He didnt turn up because he didnt want to, that excuse is rubbish imho.Comment
-
Of course I understood your reply. The one who was slow and didn't catch on was you. And, still haven't. I over estimated you. Which is fine BRO, and I won't make that mistake again.I aint your bro lol...You don't even know me. Anyway...your the one asking me how I would really know if Holyfield was clean. Well He was willing to take the test. He took it and was clean so my logic points that he was clean for that fight by his actions and reactions to the issue and you then ask me if I really know truely if his clean. Well I didn't conduct the test my self, but based on what happen I believe he was clean.
The reply I gave you was a mock of what you were asking me. You were slow on the up take. I figured you would have caught on, but I had over estimated you.
From now on, you're on the same line as Yesir, Puga, Check Hooks, Boxing genius, and all the other trolls on here.
The test that Holyfield took, was the same test we have now. It was not random, it was not blood. It was a piss test that he knew when it was coming.
To say that Holyfield was clean because the test came out clean. Then it's the same as saying that Mosley was clean because his test came out clean against Oscar in the rematch.
They took the exact same test. And, both new when it was coming.
Of course at that time that test(which is the same one we have now) was considered better than what they had at that time. Obviously because they didn't even have a test before that.
But, considering that it wasn't blood just piss. And, with the argument that we use now. That knowing when you take the test defeats the purpose. And, looking at the Olympians who were cheating at the same time frame , while tests were coming out clean.
It's safe to say that we don't know if "Evan Fields" was doping or not even for that fight. Because, one it was just piss, it wasn't random, he knew when the test was going to happen. So like now it was easy to cheat no?
I mean after all. If just taking a piss test is all it takes to prove your clean. Then WTF, I guess I was wrong for wanting better testing. Obviously the testing we have now is more than adequate.Comment
-
So your saying Holyfield was using new peds being used now back then to supersede the test that was asked back then? Holyfield was then ahead of his time. Am going by his reaction and action on the issue. I think its safe to say Peds are a little more advance now then they were then.Of course I understood your reply. The one who was slow and didn't catch on was you. And, still haven't. I over estimated you. Which is fine BRO, and I won't make that mistake again.
From now on, you're on the same line as Yesir, Puga, Check Hooks, Boxing genius, and all the other trolls on here.
The test that Holyfield took, was the same test we have now. It was not random, it was not blood. It was a piss test that he knew when it was coming.
To say that Holyfield was clean because the test came out clean. Then it's the same as saying that Mosley was clean because his test came out clean against Oscar in the rematch.
They took the exact same test. And, both new when it was coming.
Of course at that time that test(which is the same one we have now) was considered better than what they had at that time. Obviously because they didn't even have a test before that.
But, considering that it wasn't blood just piss. And, with the argument that we use now. That knowing when you take the test defeats the purpose. And, looking at the Olympians who were cheating at the same time frame , while tests were coming out clean.
It's safe to say that we don't know if "Evan Fields" was doping or not even for that fight. Because, one it was just piss, it wasn't random, he knew when the test was going to happen. So like now it was easy to cheat no?
I mean after all. If just taking a piss test is all it takes to prove your clean. Then WTF, I guess I was wrong for wanting better testing. Obviously the testing we have now is more than adequate.
You putting me on your list? You making it sound like you list means something lol........Comment


Comment