Comments Thread For: Matthysse Ready To Spoil Khan's Erik Morales Plan

[Dirk Diggler UK]

No I'm calling for Khan to fight a good fighter(not to say Matt's is not a good fighter,he is)and a fight I been wanted to see(before someone wanted to put B.S. **** in the contract cough Khan)has nothing to do with Bradley beating him or nothing like that..By the way why would I want to give Khan a chance to look better then Bradley that really makes no sense...

How Matt's is num 2 is beyond me dude is coming off of two loses..Anyway you underestimate Bradley's skill's..Alexander wanted to fight at a distance what happen there??He was unable to because Bradley made adjustments..In the Peterson fight,Peterson tried to box from the outside but was not able to do so because Bradley is accurate and can box...Khan can box but he is not accurate and he can be timed..Like I said Khan Peterson is a good fight and no matter how ya slice it,it will test Khan in ways he has not been tested before..Maybe that's why ya wanna down play Peterson..

Cos you **** ride anyone that Bradley beats. Even that bum, Abrogu.

Once again you're overestimating a fighter's worth. Ive only even seen Petersen fight 2 or 3 times and he was crap each time. I see nothing in him. He deserved to lose both his fights whereas Mathysse deserved to win his.

[Rome-By-Ko]

Cos you **** ride anyone that Bradley beats. Even that bum, Abrogu.

Once again you're overestimating a fighter's worth. Ive only even seen Petersen fight 2 or 3 times and he was crap each time. I see nothing in him. He deserved to lose both his fights whereas Mathysse deserved to win his.

See,I've been following Peterson as long as I've been following Khan and Bradley(A long time)..Peterson deserved to win his fight against Ortiz and lost clearly to Bradley..Matt's lost too Judah(who Khan just beat I might add)and deserved to win against Alexander(even tho I only had him winning by a point)...I followed Peterson and Khan for yrs which is why I know that would be a good fight has nothing to do with overrating Peterson..

As for Abregu he was an undefeated fighter with a KO%of about 80 or 85...Not overrating him just pointing out that it was a good win for Bradley being the fact he beat him at WW and took his punches well..How can I overrate a fighter who has really done nothing..But I won't **** on him like you and say he's a bum for losing to a high level fighter..He is a young dangerous(because he does have power)fighter who I bet a lot of guy's at 147lb will avoid...

[Dirk Diggler UK]

You cant score

[Froghead99]

Rome, what you keep failing to realise is fighters pick opponents who have the biggest profile, and offer the most money. Peterson is a pretty much a nobody. No belt, and no money. Peterson brings NOTHING to the table. It would be an insanely dumb fight for Khan to take.

Khan has absolutely nothing to gain from the fight, so it's a bit ridiculous to say thats who he should fight. Especially when you consider your boy Bradley openly says he doesn't give a **** about the fans, and he only fights for money, yet Khan should fight a nobody, just to please a few diehards like you? Kinda hypocritical of you isn't it?

Mattysse will have a belt, if Khan fights him, and it will be considered a notable win for his resume, and the money should be good. Khan would have to be an idiot to fight Peterson if he can choose Lucas instead.

[projectpaki]

See,I've been following Peterson as long as I've been following Khan and Bradley(A long time)..Peterson deserved to win his fight against Ortiz and lost clearly to Bradley..Matt's lost too Judah(who Khan just beat I might add)and deserved to win against Alexander(even tho I only had him winning by a point)...I followed Peterson and Khan for yrs which is why I know that would be a good fight has nothing to do with overrating Peterson..

As for Abregu he was an undefeated fighter with a KO%of about 80 or 85...Not overrating him just pointing out that it was a good win for Bradley being the fact he beat him at WW and took his punches well..How can I overrate a fighter who has really done nothing..But I won't **** on him like you and say he's a bum for losing to a high level fighter..He is a young dangerous(because he does have power)fighter who I bet a lot of guy's at 147lb will avoid...

Cmon, now you just making up excuses... I mean you act like you dont know by now, Khan has a belt collecting hobby. So for all you guys out there who think Khan should give Maidana a rematch, or shld fight Prescott or Peterson- if they dont have belts... HES NOT FIGHTING THEM!
Thats why when Bradley refused the fight, he went for Judah- because he has a belt. He wants the winner of Morales/Matthysse bc they will have a belt. And then I want to see Bradley dodge a guy who has 3 of the 4 top belts in your same division (win withstanding)

Now as far as Mattysse goes, from what I was watching I saw him beat both Judah and Alexander. AND they were both controversial SPLIT decisions, so in other words, 1 or 2 rounds could have gone the other way. And since you think Abregu is good bc of his KO%, lets talk ko%, Mattysse's is 84%. So thats 28 wins, 26 by way of ko, and the 2 who didnt lost by DQ and by NC so they lucked out in my opinion, AND his 2 losses- Judah and Alexander both hit the canvas in their respective fights. But since you like ko% so much then why didnt u mention bradleys 39% which is the second lowest out of the top 20 fighters at 140? in other words, dude is soft...

[Rome-By-Ko]

Cmon, now you just making up excuses... I mean you act like you dont know by now, Khan has a belt collecting hobby. So for all you guys out there who think Khan should give Maidana a rematch, or shld fight Prescott or Peterson- if they dont have belts... HES NOT FIGHTING THEM!
Thats why when Bradley refused the fight, he went for Judah- because he has a belt. He wants the winner of Morales/Matthysse bc they will have a belt. And then I want to see Bradley dodge a guy who has 3 of the 4 top belts in your same division (win withstanding)

Now as far as Mattysse goes, from what I was watching I saw him beat both Judah and Alexander. AND they were both controversial SPLIT decisions, so in other words, 1 or 2 rounds could have gone the other way. And since you think Abregu is good bc of his KO%, lets talk ko%, Mattysse's is 84%. So thats 28 wins, 26 by way of ko, and the 2 who didnt lost by DQ and by NC so they lucked out in my opinion, AND his 2 losses- Judah and Alexander both hit the canvas in their respective fights. But since you like ko% so much then why didnt u mention bradleys 39% which is the second lowest out of the top 20 fighters at 140? in other words, dude is soft...

Matt's has a good KO% he also has two loses(weather you thought he lost or not they are there)Abregu was undefeated...But there is no point talking to you,Bradley is soft..LMAO,watch the Bradley Holt fight and then smack ya self for ever saying Bradley is soft..Khan was KO'd by a nobody just think if he tasted that punch Bradley was hit with..Not to mention Bradley is undefeated and has just as good(imo better)resume then Khan..Please...

[Rome-By-Ko]

Rome, what you keep failing to realise is fighters pick opponents who have the biggest profile, and offer the most money. Peterson is a pretty much a nobody. No belt, and no money. Peterson brings NOTHING to the table. It would be an insanely dumb fight for Khan to take.

Khan has absolutely nothing to gain from the fight, so it's a bit ridiculous to say thats who he should fight. Especially when you consider your boy Bradley openly says he doesn't give a **** about the fans, and he only fights for money, yet Khan should fight a nobody, just to please a few diehards like you? Kinda hypocritical of you isn't it?

Mattysse will have a belt, if Khan fights him, and it will be considered a notable win for his resume, and the money should be good. Khan would have to be an idiot to fight Peterson if he can choose Lucas instead.

Ok let's say Matt's has to fight Bradley(which most likely will happen)then who should Khan fight at 140lb??Let me guess Mcflurry or Prescott,neither have a belt and neither or relevant at the weight..But I guess that will make sense to you..

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Matt's has a good KO% he also has two loses(weather you thought he lost or not they are there)Abregu was undefeated...But there is no point talking to you,Bradley is soft..LMAO,watch the Bradley Holt fight and then smack ya self for ever saying Bradley is soft..Khan was KO'd by a nobody just think if he tasted that punch Bradley was hit with..Not to mention Bradley is undefeated and has just as good(imo better)resume then Khan..Please...

You are a mong mate. I actually thought you were a boxing fan but you just liked Bradley's **** a bit too much. But turns out, you're a casual. What the *** is that bollox you just wrote? Disgraceful.

[Rome-By-Ko]

You are a mong mate. I actually thought you were a boxing fan but you just liked Bradley's **** a bit too much. But turns out, you're a casual. What the *** is that bollox you just wrote? Disgraceful.

Dumb azz those are facts,try knowing some..What is wrong with stating the facts??Matt's has two loses does he not??Am I missing something??Was Abregu not undefeated when Bradley beat him??I don't get what's wrong with the post except you are butt hurt because it's not in line with what ya feelings on the matter..If I miss a fact let me know until then STFU...

[Rip Chudd]

Dumb azz those are facts,try knowing some..What is wrong with stating the facts??Matt's has two loses does he not??Am I missing something??Was Abregu not undefeated when Bradley beat him??I don't get what's wrong with the post except you are butt hurt because it's not in line with what ya feelings on the matter..If I miss a fact let me know until then STFU...

Seems as if people don't like facts now, they'd rather post on emotion instead of what has actually transpired. Weird.