Kessler-Calzaghe or Froch-Ward?
More meaningful fight at Super Middleweight?
Collapse
-
Kessler-Calzaghe was for undisputed title and who's the best
Ward Froch will show who's the best, but only 2 unified belts
Kessler-Calzaghe was bigger -
Comment
-
Kessler vs Sir Joe. There was no one else at SMW at the time. Bootay is still out there after this fight.Comment
-
At the time Kessler and Cal were the best smw fighters in the world, undefeated and prime for action. I feel it was more meaningful then Froch/Ward, If the Kessler that fought Joe was in the super 6 it would have been a different outcome, and even that Kessler was able to beat Froch.Comment
-
Bute was IBF champ when Calz fought Kessler. And Bute is as significant now as he was then because his level of opposition is still the same.
The 3rd man in the division who can claim any sort of supremacy is Mikkel Kessler, he's the one with the win over one of the finalists that should be 1st in line to fight the winner.Comment
-
who would want to see Ward - Kessler II aside of BattNelson ?Bute was IBF champ when Calz fought Kessler. And Bute is as significant now as he was then because his level of opposition is still the same.
The 3rd man in the division who can claim any sort of supremacy is Mikkel Kessler, he's the one with the win over one of the finalists that should be 1st in line to fight the winner.
and Bute grabbed the belt that Calzaghe had vacated, so he really was undisputed anywayComment
-
-
yes i know. it was a weak ass division. kessler and calzaghe were beating bums and then they fought to decide who was the best bum beater. ward and froch just fought all the other top guys and they are the 2 left standing. bute-steigletz would be the equivalent of kessler-calzaghe.Comment
Comment