There has been some talk about several shady things regarding these organizations. Unfair ratings, ridiculous sanctioning fees, fighters being stripped of their titles because of nothing, and so on. Which organization do you think is the worse right now?
I personally would choose the IBF. First, they kept LJ rated in the lightweight top ten after his death. That is some serious lack of organization. I also read on the site that talks boxing, that the IBF has Roque Cassiani in the top 15 even after he is like 2-11 since 2002. Another thing is that I think that IBF heavyweight champion Chris Byrd has been part of some terrible decisions. First, the fight against Oquendo, then the draw against Golota, and the narrow win over McCline. Three fights in a row that could have been three decision losses to Byrd. Well, at least the first two. Still, he holds the belt.
All in all, I see a lot of controversy surrounding the IBF. This is some objective posting. I am not hating on any organization. It's just that these aforementioned things are strange to say the least.
I personally would choose the IBF. First, they kept LJ rated in the lightweight top ten after his death. That is some serious lack of organization. I also read on the site that talks boxing, that the IBF has Roque Cassiani in the top 15 even after he is like 2-11 since 2002. Another thing is that I think that IBF heavyweight champion Chris Byrd has been part of some terrible decisions. First, the fight against Oquendo, then the draw against Golota, and the narrow win over McCline. Three fights in a row that could have been three decision losses to Byrd. Well, at least the first two. Still, he holds the belt.
All in all, I see a lot of controversy surrounding the IBF. This is some objective posting. I am not hating on any organization. It's just that these aforementioned things are strange to say the least.
Comment