Originally posted by mathed
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Roach: Khan is Ahead of Bradley, Mayweather in 2012
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View PostHey dumb azz you do know Bradley was suppose to be free of Shaw after the Alexander fight right??But the fans wanted that fight too he did it and was fuuck for doing so as we see now..And how would he be able to not have to sign an extentsion if his contrct ended on June 1st and the fight. Would have been on July 23rd??Can you answer that??Thanks,I know you'll have all the answers..LOL..
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by -Lowkey- View PostTim Bradley “What if I lose to Khan, I'm out of the sweep steaks for the big fights“
That is a fact.
According to Shaw, Bradley didn't have to sign a contract extension he could of made the fight with Bradley and they both could have walked there separate ways.
Lol at these brain dead idiots now attempting to make out that Khan is the one who is ducking are you ******ed?
Bradley ducked Khan turned down a career high pay day. Bradleys main priority is to protect his 0 until he gets the chance to cash out with a fight against Pac let's be honest if he is not confident he can beat Khan, he's not going to be confident in his ability to beat Pac he just wants the cheque.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by whatismyname View PostSeriously you should change your name from "Rome by Ko" to "****** by default"
Bradley verbally AGREED to the july date (which was his last fight with Shaw) before withdrawing. Then he clearly stated in an interview "where do I go if I lose to Khan?". He singlehandedly robbed boxing, his fans and boxingfans of one of it's biggest unifying fights out there right now (which would've made him most likely a top contender for PAC or May aswel).
And what's the point of "down the line" when we the boxing fans wanted a clear number one at 140 now? It's bull****
Can't really tell if u're a bradley nuthugger or one of these blind hating butt holes like Charlie.
Leave a comment:
-
Tim Bradley “What if I lose to Khan, I'm out of the sweep steaks for the big fights“
That is a fact.
According to Shaw, Bradley didn't have to sign a contract extension he could of made the fight with Bradley and they both could have walked there separate ways.
Lol at these brain dead idiots now attempting to make out that Khan is the one who is ducking are you ******ed?
Bradley ducked Khan turned down a career high pay day. Bradleys main priority is to protect his 0 until he gets the chance to cash out with a fight against Pac let's be honest if he is not confident he can beat Khan, he's not going to be confident in his ability to beat Pac he just wants the cheque.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View PostYea forget Khan if I have to still be tied to Shaw finish the rest for ya..I keep telling people who love to quote Bradley to finish the quote..Bradley is not gonna dance to Khans tune and be trap with Shaw even longer(which is what would have happen)and any fight fan with half a brain should now that is the case..How/why would Shaw let Bradley take a walk??It would not make sense for him to let one of his fighters leave him at the level Timmy is at..So if the choice is fight Khan for a decent amount of money,and if ya win still have to deal with legal bull**** anyway just to get away..Or wait it out and get it out the way now??I would have got it out the way as well,it was a smart move..Funny thing is Bradley never said he would never fight Khan or that he did not want to fight Khan..But he did say later on down the line he would fight Khan..I seem to remember Khan saying something very similar when Bradley came around for a fight not to long ago..Interesting how one remembers one but not the other...
Bradley verbally AGREED to the july date (which was his last fight with Shaw) before withdrawing. Then he clearly stated in an interview "where do I go if I lose to Khan?". He singlehandedly robbed boxing, his fans and boxingfans of one of it's biggest unifying fights out there right now (which would've made him most likely a top contender for PAC or May aswel).
And what's the point of "down the line" when we the boxing fans wanted a clear number one at 140 now? It's bull****
Can't really tell if u're a bradley nuthugger or one of these blind hating butt holes like Charlie.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View PostYea forget Khan if I have to still be tied to Shaw finish the rest for ya..I keep telling people who love to quote Bradley to finish the quote..Bradley is not gonna dance to Khans tune and be trap with Shaw even longer(which is what would have happen)and any fight fan with half a brain should now that is the case..How/why would Shaw let Bradley take a walk??It would not make sense for him to let one of his fighters leave him at the level Timmy is at..So if the choice is fight Khan for a decent amount of money,and if ya win still have to deal with legal bull**** anyway just to get away..Or wait it out and get it out the way now??I would have got it out the way as well,it was a smart move..Funny thing is Bradley never said he would never fight Khan or that he did not want to fight Khan..But he did say later on down the line he would fight Khan..I seem to remember Khan saying something very similar when Bradley came around for a fight not to long ago..Interesting how one remembers one but not the other...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post"Forget Amir Khan" - Timothy Bradley
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by adp023 View PostMayweather won't touch Khan before Pacquiao. GUARANTEED!!
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: