Originally posted by KLTP
View Post
Lewis said it. Steward said it as well on HBO. How you came up with what you wrote is beyond me.
Originally posted by DJ_WooDoX
View Post
Originally posted by jrosales13
View Post
Its just that casual boxing fans don't know or care about things like that. They just throw around terms like "great", "greatest", "P4P" and "ATF". Nobody bothers to investigate a claim like that. They just take commentators' word for it. They listen to magazine writers opinions, even though the writers are just as biased as commentators. They too get paid by the powers that be in the boxing industry. The Ring is owned by Oscar DelaHoya, but most peasants don't even have a clue.
I digress.
After Jones defeated Hopkins, Hopkins stayed at MW and fought for the belt RJJ vacated and got a draw. Jones went up to SMW, fought and dominated the P4P#1 fighter in the world. Hopkins then fought Mercado again for the same vacant title. This time Hopkins won.
Hopkins stayed at MW and defended his lone vacant IBF title up until 2001. The interesting fun fact is that Hopkins avoided every champion at MW from the beginning. Hopkins hadn't competed against a world champion until he fought Keith Holmes in 2001. Jones had become the SMW champion, then moved up and become the ltHW champion. Then Jones unified the 175lb division on belt at a time.
In 2003 Roy Jones became the first man in 100 years to be a MW and win a HW title. In 2004, BHOP fought and beat DLH.
There's a HUGE difference in their careers. The only difference between the two is that Jones got older quicker. That won't have any impact on his legacy though. Most of the old guys stayed around too long. Jones won't be any different.
I've give BHOP credit as making power moves since 2005, but from 1988-2001 he basically hid out at MW where there was no one there. He didn't unify the division until 13 years later, and then he let the momentum his career had gained from that achievement waste away until 2005.
IMO, Hopkins career didn't really begin until 2005. He came alive like a young, hungry fighter. I've always known he had the goods, but for 17 years he didn't show the heart.
Its amazing that he's taken charge of his legacy so late in the game with this kind of success. That doesn't make what he's done any greater just because he was over 40 when he did it. No one made him squander his prime years. He has himself to blame for that.
Being over 40 just gives his list accomplishments another wrinkle to acknowledge.
As far as Tyson vs Jones at that point, Jones wins hands down. Tyson was too deteriorated. A puncher's chance doesn't mean that Jones would have even come close to losing ... and all Tyson had going for him at that point was punching power.
Comment