Why was there no immediate rematch for Ortiz-Berto?

[Spray_resistant]

Because Ortiz clearly won and there is no need for one.

There we have it, there was no controversy and it was a clear Ortiz win.

[Unknown Champ]

Believe it or not, I, like very few, picked Ortiz to win against Berto and I believe its a toss up fight and Berto could have one just as well. Berto could beat Ortiz in a rematch if he didnt take Bertos heart, both are B level boxers at best.

[sugersean15]

Because berto thought he was going to walk over ortiz and was getting mayweather next

[gauze]

berto has ****** ankles. thats why

[bojangles1987]

What would have been the point? Ortiz beat the hell out of Berto. That fight was not as close as people remember it being.

[STREET CLEANER]

No need to when Vic is fighting Floyd. All those years Berto fighting B opposition in order to secure a big money fight and he blows it

[gauze]

What would have been the point? Ortiz beat the hell out of Berto. That fight was not as close as people remember it being.

berto won like 2-3 rounds and it wasnt as good as people remember it being either. and his ankles. has anyone else noticed that? thats why he's all hype

[D4thincarnation]

The fight was competitive and I think a rematch is a must.

Ortiz won comfortably. Berto maybe won 3 rounds but that's about it.

[Bushbaby]

Berto was fighting from behind the entire fight & the 1 time he took the lead, 2 hooks put him right back behind again.

[Troav]

Didn't Berto go and get a tribal tattoo after this fight?