In a recent interview given in Moscow, Wlad stated that he wants to fight either Byrd or Brewster, depending on who becomes available first.
However, he said that the fight with Byrd is more interesting to him. Would you prefer to see Brewster-Wlad II or Byrd-Wlad II?
I think Brewster is definitely a more interesting fight. However, strategically, the fight with Byrd is a much better choice, since in the event of beating Byrd, Wlad can still easily guarantee a fight with Brewster. It would not work the other way around, since in the event of defeating Brewster, Wlad will loose the status of a mandatory challenger for Byrd, and the Wlad-Byrd fight will never happen.
---------------------------------
Source of the article referred to above:
Wladimir Klitschko eyes world champion title
MOSCOW, October 8 (RIA Novosti) -- Ukrainian super-heavyweight boxer Wladimir Klitschko wants to fight for the world champion title as soon as possible, he said at a news conference in Moscow Saturday.
"I don't want to wait 10 or 12 months. I will do my best to do it as soon as possible," the younger Klitschko said.
He continued that he would have to fight either American Cris Byrd or Lamon Brewster.
"Of these two, I would prefer Cris Byrd," he said, explaining that it would be more of a challenge for him to fight this boxer.
Klitschko also shared his impressions from his fight with Nigerian Samuel Peter, which took place on September 24 in Atlantic City and ended with the Ukrainian's victory. "Samuel Peter used some forbidden tricks and I was not ready for that of course," he said. "The referee saw it, but I was not going to argue him."
"Samuel Peter was one of the most promising boxers in the super-heavy weight category until he met me," Klitschko said.
Wladimir Klitschko said that his visit to Russia was unofficial and that in several days he would go to Los Angeles where his older brother Vitali was training to fight against American Hasim Rahman.
However, he said that the fight with Byrd is more interesting to him. Would you prefer to see Brewster-Wlad II or Byrd-Wlad II?
I think Brewster is definitely a more interesting fight. However, strategically, the fight with Byrd is a much better choice, since in the event of beating Byrd, Wlad can still easily guarantee a fight with Brewster. It would not work the other way around, since in the event of defeating Brewster, Wlad will loose the status of a mandatory challenger for Byrd, and the Wlad-Byrd fight will never happen.
---------------------------------
Source of the article referred to above:
Wladimir Klitschko eyes world champion title
MOSCOW, October 8 (RIA Novosti) -- Ukrainian super-heavyweight boxer Wladimir Klitschko wants to fight for the world champion title as soon as possible, he said at a news conference in Moscow Saturday.
"I don't want to wait 10 or 12 months. I will do my best to do it as soon as possible," the younger Klitschko said.
He continued that he would have to fight either American Cris Byrd or Lamon Brewster.
"Of these two, I would prefer Cris Byrd," he said, explaining that it would be more of a challenge for him to fight this boxer.
Klitschko also shared his impressions from his fight with Nigerian Samuel Peter, which took place on September 24 in Atlantic City and ended with the Ukrainian's victory. "Samuel Peter used some forbidden tricks and I was not ready for that of course," he said. "The referee saw it, but I was not going to argue him."
"Samuel Peter was one of the most promising boxers in the super-heavy weight category until he met me," Klitschko said.
Wladimir Klitschko said that his visit to Russia was unofficial and that in several days he would go to Los Angeles where his older brother Vitali was training to fight against American Hasim Rahman.
Comment