Comments Thread For: Richardson: Marquez Might Be Better Than Pacquiao

[LeadUppercut]

Pac-fans who bash Marquez for the catch-weight are nothing but dishonest pig-ignorant ****s.

1.) Pacquiao ducked Marquez at 130.....

http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

2.) CLEARLY, that fight should take place at 140, which just so happens to be Pac's best weight.....

http://www.fighthype.com/pages/content9683.html

3.) Marquez doesnt want that catch-weight, how the *** is fighting at 145 better for Marquez than fighting at 140, ya dopey pricks?

[LeadUppercut]

OMG, did some arsewipe pac-fan just bash Marquez for demanding a catchweight?



The Manny-circus

What a fkn joke that kid and his pig-ignorant fanbase have become.

[-Kev-]

Yeah okay. U id*ts underestimate pacman ring smarts.

What ring smarts? You don't need to have Bernard Hopkins-like ring intelligence to fight come forward fighters/fighters who "come to fight". Pacquiao is a good fighter, not a good boxer. Pacquiao can **** and trade, hence why his matchmakers/Roach match him up with the same style of opponents.

[ADP02]

What the *** are you talking about kid ?

Smarten up idiot. This is yet another Pacquiao fight that will take place at catchweight, so go talk to that clown Pacquiao. It is Manny who is making a living by feeding off old men, faded champions, and bums, so what could you expect but yet another exhibition match?

You claim to be a pac-fan, so how about you call out that hype-job Pacquiao and ask him why he ducked Marquez at 130 and will only fight him now at welter?

Pacquiao is a ch1cken-**** b1tch for ducking Marquez at 130.

http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

And Pacquiao is a ch1cken-**** b1tch for demanding that Marquez fight at welter when the WHOLE WORLD can see that JMM cant hang above 135. Pacquiao even states that 140 is his best weight, but he would not do the right thing and meet Marquez in the middle, even though Pac admits that he is a natural JWW.....

http://www.fighthype.com/pages/content9683.html

Your blatant dishonesty is why I had you on ignore for so long.

What a whiney b1tch you are kid.....

1.) Pacquiao ducks Marquez at 130
2.) Then Pacquiao agree's to fight him at a weight that Manny knows JMM cant handle, refusing to consider 140, even though he admits it is his best weight

You fkn idiot clown, 140 would be much fairer, they obviously want every conceivable advantage over the 40yo midget, you must be so proud.

lol!

Like I thought, you consider that Marquez can't hang at anything above 135 so it's OK for him to demand catchweights but Manny, who you say is at his best at 140 does not deserve that kind of respect when he jumps up to 147 intially and even against JMW.

You still have not explained the difference? I thought you hate people who agree to catchweights. Why don't you do the same when Marquez does it? Why only when Manny does it?



My comment was on the above, not the other stuff you tried to hide by .... but I told you way back that Manny vs Marquez at 140+ is not what I wanted to see. So Manny has everything to lose in this fight and Marquez has everything to win.


These guys had already 2 great fights but you are saying that Manny has been ducking Marquez. Maybe its because Manny moved up and fought guys like Oscar, Cotto at WW .... but you don't see that .... too bad!


To make it clear, my comments have nothing to do with where this fight should take place at (140 or 144 or 135 or 147) .... it has more to do with YOU and how your mind sees things differently depending on if you hate or like the fighter.


For you:
- Manny asks for his first 2 fights catchweights at a new division, that's being a coward.
- Marquez asks for his first 2 fights catchweights at a new division, that's fine.


The difference again was what? Oh ya, Marquez opponent must come down further to a weight he hasn't fought in 2.5 years! lol! .... Would you ask your guy to go down to 140 and burn muscle when his next fight may possibly be his biggest fight of his career and that is against Floyd at 147lbs?

[ADP02]

OMG, did some arsewipe pac-fan just bash Marquez for demanding a catchweight?



The Manny-circus

What a fkn joke that kid and his pig-ignorant fanbase have become.

You still don't get it .... No one is bashing Marquez. We are just bashing you, like usual.

Why (this time)? Because you despise people who ask for catchweights and call them cowards for even requesting a 1lb drop from their previous fight (ie Cotto vs Manny) but don't mind when its your guy that does it and you would be OK with even requesting the opponent going down further in weight!

Crazy stuff man!!!

[LeadUppercut]

lol!

Like I thought, you consider that Marquez can't hang at anything above 135 so it's OK for him to demand catchweights but Manny, who you say is at his best at 140 does not deserve that kind of respect when he jumps up to 147 intially and even against JMW.

You still have not explained the difference? I thought you hate people who agree to catchweights. Why don't you do the same when Marquez does it? Why only when Manny does it?

My comment was on the above, not the other stuff you tried to hide by .... but I told you way back that Manny vs Marquez at 140+ is not what I wanted to see. So Manny has everything to lose in this fight and Marquez has everything to win.

These guys had already 2 great fights but you are saying that Manny has been ducking Marquez. Maybe its because Manny moved up and fought guys like Oscar, Cotto at WW .... but you don't see that .... too bad!

To make it clear, my comments have nothing to do with where this fight should take place at (140 or 144 or 135 or 147) .... it has more to do with YOU and how your mind sees things differently depending on if you hate or like the fighter.

For you:
- Manny asks for his first 2 fights catchweights at a new division, that's being a coward.
- Marquez asks for his first 2 fights catchweights at a new division, that's fine.

The difference again was what? Oh ya, Marquez opponent must come down further to a weight he hasn't fought in 2.5 years! lol! .... Would you ask your guy to go down to 140 and burn muscle when his next fight may possibly be his biggest fight of his career and that is against Floyd at 147lbs?

I dont read your whiney dribble kid.

You are nothing but a pig-ignorant flag-waving non-boxing fan-boi.

You are back on ignore, permanently, for continual dishonesty.

CLEARLY, Pac ducked JMM at 130, because his own camp admitted it.....

http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

Give yourself an uppercut.

You do not need to answer this question, because I will not be able to see your reply anyway, but you can think about it while you are giving yourself that uppercut mentioned earlier.....

Instead of dragging Marquez up TWO DIVISIONS to welter, when THE ENTIRE WORLD could see that JMM looked old, fat, and slow, the last time he ventured above 135..... why didnt Pacquiao meet Marquez halfway and fight at 140 seeing that JWW is Mannys best weight anyways?

You can also answer these questions, you dishonest little clown, once again I will not see your reply, but I am sure that an adult who is prepared to spend the time will wipe your arse for you.

1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....

http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

[LeadUppercut]

I dont read your whiney dribble kid.

You are nothing but a pig-ignorant flag-waving non-boxing fan-boi.

You are back on ignore, permanently, for continual dishonesty.

CLEARLY, Pac ducked JMM at 130, because his own camp admitted it.....

http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

Give yourself an uppercut.

You do not need to answer this question, because I will not be able to see your reply anyway, but you can think about it while you are giving yourself that uppercut mentioned earlier.....

Instead of dragging Marquez up TWO DIVISIONS to welter, when THE ENTIRE WORLD could see that JMM looked old, fat, and slow, the last time he ventured above 135..... why didnt Pacquiao meet Marquez halfway and fight at 140 seeing that JWW is Mannys best weight anyways?

You can also answer these questions, you dishonest little clown, once again I will not see your reply, but I am sure that an adult who is prepared to spend the time will wipe your arse for you.

1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....
http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

Brilliant, ignore, a quick refresh, and the page looks so much nicer without a wall of dribble from that ADP02 kid.

Why did I remove him from ignore anyways, "ADP02" and "inbox" should be tied up, p1ssed on, and dragged behind a horse, just like they used to do with dishonest ****s back in the good ol' days

[ADP02]

I dont read your whiney dribble kid.

You are nothing but a pig-ignorant flag-waving non-boxing fan-boi.

You are back on ignore, permanently, for continual dishonesty.

CLEARLY, Pac ducked JMM at 130, because his own camp admitted it.....

http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

Give yourself an uppercut.

You do not need to answer this question, because I will not be able to see your reply anyway, but you can think about it while you are giving yourself that uppercut mentioned earlier.....

Instead of dragging Marquez up TWO DIVISIONS to welter, when THE ENTIRE WORLD could see that JMM looked old, fat, and slow, the last time he ventured above 135..... why didnt Pacquiao meet Marquez halfway and fight at 140 seeing that JWW is Mannys best weight anyways?

You can also answer these questions, you dishonest little clown, once again I will not see your reply, but I am sure that an adult who is prepared to spend the time will wipe your arse for you.

1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....
http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

So you don't read my posts yet you put me on ignore? lol!

You can't answer my questions because you know that I am right, AGAIN! That is why you have to put me on ignore ....

[Carpe Diem]

LMFAO!!
Richardson is giving respect to Marquez AFTER him and Mosley's camp laughed at his performance in his second fight against Pacquiao. They were giggling at him being stunned a couple times then go out and give a humiliating performance like they did, HA! Keep your comments about Marquez to yourself Lard ass, I doubt anyone cares what a joke like yourself would have to say about anything.

I'm a huge JMM fan, but i grinned when Manny landed that punch on him at 1:38.

[LeadUppercut]

" This message is hidden because ADP02 is on your ignore list "

I would bet that short sentence signifies a large wall of dishonest dribble.

A wall of dribble, in reply to a post, that did not actually address any of the issues in that post, and conveniently ignored all facts and common-sense based assertions, but instead replied with a bunch of childish excuses that would not even be relevant if we were discussing anyone but Pacquiao.

Would that be correct ?

I would just about bet my house on it, on the blind

I would certainly bet that there was no honest attempt made to address any of these questions either.....

1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....

http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5