Comments Thread For: Lederman Reflects on The Scoring of Williams-Lara

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Lederman Reflects on The Scoring of Williams-Lara

    The boxing world has been buzzing over the highly-controversial decision rendered in the HBO main event between Paul Williams and Erislandy Lara on July 15th, a bout in which Lara seemed to dominate yet was deemed the loser by majority decision by judges Donald Givens, Hilton Whitaker III and Al Bennett.

    [Click Here To Read More]
  • tikyo
    Amateur
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 6
    • 0
    • 0
    • 6,050

    #2
    The fight was on July 9 not July 15.

    Comment

    • daggum
      All time great
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2008
      • 43501
      • 4,558
      • 3
      • 166,270

      #3
      this guy makes no sense at all. he scored alexander-kotelnik and calzaghe-hopkins for the 2 guys throwing air punches not for the guys doing the most damage. now he's saying the opposite? he's even said multiple times he scores rounds for guys coming forward and being busy. no consistency at all.

      if you are gonna ignore the rules of judging and make up your own rules at least stick with them. don't use the official rules sometimes and then your own rules other times depending on which fighter you like more. you just look totally disingenuous.
      Last edited by daggum; 07-27-2011, 04:07 AM.

      Comment

      • manmoon
        Up and Comer
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • May 2010
        • 56
        • 0
        • 15
        • 6,118

        #4
        Originally posted by daggum
        this guy makes no sense at all. he scored alexander-kotelnik and calzaghe-hopkins for the 2 guys throwing air punches not for the guys doing the most damage. now he's saying the opposite? he's even said multiple times he scores rounds for guys coming forward and being busy. no consistency at all.

        if you are gonna ignore the rules of judging and make up your own rules at least stick with them. don't use the official rules sometimes and then your own rules other times depending on which fighter you like more. you just look totally disingenuous.
        Agreed, came into this thread to say the exact same thing.

        Comment

        • fatmash
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Mar 2006
          • 544
          • 44
          • 0
          • 6,880

          #5
          lederman need talk hes the same man who had ali winning his final fight with norton !! .......................... one the worst decisions iv ever seen !!!

          Comment

          • vrodz
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • May 2008
            • 688
            • 10
            • 1
            • 6,988

            #6
            Good post. This guy has scores are usually disgracefull andhe has the balls to past judgementon three morons from Atlantic City. He usually favors Americanfighters or HBO hyped fighters no matter what.
            I still remember he had williams winning againts quintana the first time they met when williams was still beingpampered by HBO. By the way it was quintana he laid down the blue print on how to beat williams not martinez as everyone seems to believe

            Comment

            • Medved
              Oh Mah Gawd!
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Aug 2010
              • 23633
              • 757
              • 323
              • 30,849

              #7
              Lederman usually is spot on with his scoring, but only when those fights dont involve AA fighters. Just watch the Kotelnik-Alexander fight, dude was sloberring over air punches and even the biased Kellerman was like uhmm dude wtf you scoring?

              Comment

              • adp023
                Banned
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • May 2004
                • 942
                • 47
                • 156
                • 1,055

                #8
                Harold Lederman is well-respected and knows what he's talking about!

                [IMG]http://i599.***********.com/albums/tt71/adp823/Castillo-MayweatherScorecard.jpg?t=1311778871[/IMG]

                Comment

                • chiguy91
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 8865
                  • 1,239
                  • 1,515
                  • 17,428

                  #9
                  even though lederman has a bad rep, it's good to see him siding against pwill's gift decision. the decision should be changed though, temporarily suspending the 3 judges isn't enough imo. either way, hopefully lara gets more big fights.

                  Comment

                  • delpilar
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Jun 2011
                    • 647
                    • 18
                    • 1
                    • 6,748

                    #10
                    Those 3 boxing judges should be banned for life, suspension means nothing.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP